Showing posts with label dance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dance. Show all posts

Monday, July 29, 2019

Medea on Stage

after Robert Edge Pine
Mrs Yates in the character of Medea
after 1771
watercolor
Yale Center for British Art

Anonymous Printmaker
Mrs Yates in Medea
ca. 1771
etching
Victoria & Albert Museum

Robert Gaillard after Jean-Baptiste Martin
Medea in the opera Jason et Medée
1779
hand-colored engraving
Museum of Fine Arts, Boston

Francesco Bartolozzi after Nathaniel Dance
Jason et Medée - Ballet Tragique
1781
etching and aquatint
British Museum

"A satire on tragic poses in dancing, showing Gaetano Vestris as Jason between two danseuses, the one on the right is Medea.  The scene takes place in an architectural setting with a garden in the background beyond.  Below are the heads and shoulders of three members of the orchestra."

John Thornthwaite
Mrs Siddons as Medea
1792
etching and engraving
British Museum

I once had Parents – ye endearing names!
How my torn heart with recollection bleeds!

Georg Melchior Kraus
Mlle. Raucourt as Medea
before 1806
etching
Victoria & Albert Museum

Alfred Edward Chalon
Madame Pasta as Medea
1826
watercolor
Victoria & Albert Museum

"The Italian soprano Giuditta Pasta was born in Saronno in 1797 and studied with Giuseppe Scappa in Milan, where she made her debut in 1815.  . . .  She is said to have introduced dramatic realism to the opera stage, and her fame was as much a result of the intensity of her acting as of the brilliance of her voice, which became increasingly uneven towards the end of her career." 


John Hayter
Madame Pasta in Medea
ca. 1827
lithograph
Victoria & Albert Museum

G.H. Davidson (publisher)
Frederick Robson as opera singer Adelaide Ristori in Medea
ca. 1856
lithotint (music cover)
Victoria & Albert Museum

"This sheet music is illustrated with a photograph of the celebrated comedian and singer, the diminutive Frederick Robson (1821-1864), dressed as Italian opera singer Adelaide Ristori playing Medea, which she had done in Paris in 1856 in Ernst Legouvé's 3-act opera Medea.  Robson, who was born in Margate as Thomas Brownhill, became a star of London's Olympic Theatre and eventually one of its managers.  He had a great talent for burlesque, or performances that parodied the originals, and he was a hit in the burlesque Medea, or, Best of Mothers, with a Brute of a Husband, written by Robert Brough, which opened at the Olympic on 14 July 1856.  Charles Dickens noted in one of his letters that in it Robson performed 'a frantic song and dagger dance, about 10 minutes long altogether, which has more passion in it than Ristori could express in 50 years.'

André-Adolphe-Eugène Disdéri
Opera singer Adelaide Ristori in the role of Medea
ca. 1860
albumen print (carte de visite)
Royal Collection, Great Britain

London Stereoscopic and Photographic Company
Kate Bateman as Medea
1872
albumen print (carte de visite)
Victoria & Albert Museum

"Photography was a novel and exciting development in Victorian days.  Most actors and actresses had studio photographs taken, in everyday dress or theatrical costume, for cartes de visite and later cabinet cards.  Both were albumen prints made from glass negatives, attached to stiff card backing printed with the photographer's name.  Cartes de visite, the size of formal visiting cards, were patented in 1854 and produced in their millions during the 1860s, when it became fashionable to collect them.  . . .  They were superseded in the late 1870s by the larger and sturdier cabinet cards, whose popularity waned in turn during the 1890s in favour of postcards and studio portraits."

Anonymous Printmaker
Sarah Bernhardt as Medea
ca. 1895-1905
hand-colored lithograph
Victoria & Albert Museum

Carl Van Vechten
Judith Anderson as Medea
1948
gelatin silver print
Philadelphia Museum of Art

Roslav Szaybo
Euripides' Medea
at Lyric Theatre, Hammersmith

1986
printed poster
Victoria & Albert Museum

Rod Tuach
Susan Curnow as Medea
(in a version by Brendan Kennelly)

1989
printed poster
Victoria & Albert Museum

Dewynters Ltd., London
Diana Rigg in Euripides' Medea
at Wyndham's Theatre, London

1993
printed poster
Victoria & Albert Museum

Hugo Glendinning
Fiona Shaw in Euripides' Medea
at Queen's Theatre, London

2001
printed poster
Victoria & Albert Museum

– quoted texts from curator's notes at the Victoria & Albert Museum

Monday, June 24, 2019

Photography: A Little Summa - Susan Sontag

Lynne Cohen
Furniture Showroom
1979
gelatin silver print
Tate Gallery, London

Marketa Luskacova
Woman and Man with Bread, Spitalfields, London
1976
gelatin silver print
Tate Gallery, London

Jonas Dovydenas
Adolescent, Manchester, Kentucky
1971
gelatin silver print
Minneapolis Institute of Art

Guy Bourdin
Untitled
1952
gelatin silver print
Tate Gallery, London

Iwao Yamawaki
Cafeteria after Lunch, Bauhaus, Dessau
ca. 1930-32
gelatin silver print
Tate Gallery, London

1. Photography is, first of all, a way of seeing.  It is not seeing itself.

2.  It is the ineluctably "modern" way of seeing – prejudiced in favor of projects of discovery and innovation.

Yva (Else Simon)
Dance
ca. 1933
photogravure
private collection

Edvard Munch
Self-portrait “à la Marat”
1908-1909
photograph
Munch Museum, Oslo

Samuel Joshua Beckett
Loїe Fuller Dancing
ca. 1900
gelatin silver print
Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York

Arnold Genthe
Merchant and Body Guard, Old Chinatown, San Francisco
ca. 1896-1906
gelatin silver print
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

Adrien Constant de Rebecque
Man posed as Dying Soldier
ca. 1863
albumen print
Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York

6.  In the modern way of knowing, there have to be images for something to become "real."  Photographs identify events.  Photographs confer importance on events and make them memorable.  For a war, an atrocity, a pandemic, a so-called natural disaster to become a subject of large concern, it has to reach people through the various systems (from television and the internet to newspapers and magazines) that diffuse photographic images to millions.

7.  In the modern way of seeing, reality is first of all appearance  – which is always changing.  A photograph records appearance.  The record of photography is the record of change, of the destruction of the past.  Being modern (and if we have the habit of looking at photographs, we are by definition modern), we understand all identities to be constructions.  The only irrefutable reality – and our best clue to identity – is how people appear.

Mathew Brady
Portrait of Edwin Booth and his daughter Edwina
ca. 1863-65
albumen print
George Eastman House, Rochester NY 

Lady Clementina Hawarden
Poodle on Chairs
1861
albumen print
Victoria & Albert Museum

Horatio Ross
Tree
ca. 1858
albumen silver print
Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York

Roger Fenton
Billiard Room at Mentmore
ca. 1858
albumen silver print
Getty Museum, Los Angeles

John Adams Whipple and James Wallace Black
The Moon
ca. 1857-60
salted paper print
Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York

10.  To know is, first of all, to acknowledge.  Recognition is the form of knowledge that is now identified with art. The photographs of the terrible cruelties and injustices that afflict most people in the world seem to be telling us – we who are privileged and relatively safe – that we should be aroused; that we should want something done to stop these horrors.  And then there are photographs that seem to invite a different kind of attention.  For this ongoing body of work, photography is not a species of social or moral agitation, meant to prod us to feel and to act, but an enterprise of notation.  We watch, we take note, we acknowledge.  This is a cooler way of looking.  This is the way of looking we identify as art.

11.  The work of some of the best socially engaged photographers is often reproached if it seems too much like art.  And photography understood as art may incur a parallel reproach – that it deadens concern.  It shows us events and situations and conflicts that we might deplore, and asks us to be detached.  It may show us something truly horrifying and be a test of what we can bear to look at and are supposed to accept. Or often – this is true of a good deal of the most brilliant contemporary photography – it simply invites us to stare at banality.  To stare at banality and also to relish it, drawing on the very developed habits of irony that are affirmed by the surreal juxtapositions of photographs typical of sophisticated exhibitions and books.

Louis-Antoine Froissart
Flood in Lyon
1856
albumen silver print
Getty Museum, Los Angeles

Franck-François-Genès Chauvassaignes
Nude artist's model
ca. 1856-59
salted paper print
Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York

Mervyn Herbert Nevil Story Maskelyne
Charlton House, Malmesbury, Wiltshire
1856
salted paper print
Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam

Louis-Adolphe Humbert de Molard
Louis Dodier as a Prisoner
1847
daguerreotype
Musée d'Orsay, Paris

Joseph-Philibert Girault de Prangey
Ancient Columns
early 1840s
daguerreotype
Getty Museum, Los Angeles

– text by Susan Sontag, from Photography: A Little Summa (2003)

Friday, December 14, 2018

Personal Intimate Sentimentalism of Henri Le Sidaner

Henri Le Sidaner
Beguinage - Maisons à contre jour, Bruges
1899
oil on canvas
Dundee Art Galleries and Museums Collection, Scotland

Henri Le Sidaner
Canal in Autumn (Grisors)
1913
oil on canvas
Cleveland Museum of Art

Henri Le Sidaner
Nemours, Seine-et-Marne, France
before 1935
oil on canvas
Museums Sheffield, South Yorkshire

Henri Le Sidaner
Red Houses, Bruges
before 1939
oil on canvas
Paisley Art Institute Collection, Scotland

"Like other species, artists club together in movements not just for purposes of identification but for longevity.  Individuals who don't belong to schools take longer establishing reputations during their lifetimes, and tend to lose them sooner after their deaths.  Henri Le Sidaner (1862-1939) was one such individual: a contemporary of the Post-Impressionists who painted in dots but was not a Pointillist; revelled in complementary colours but was not a Fauve; and drew a veil of dreams over reality but was not a Symbolist, or only briefly.  He was, as his friend the critic Gabriel Mourey described him, 'a sort of mystic who has no faith.'  When asked what school he belonged to, his own reply was: 'None. But if you absolutely insist on categorising me, I am an intimist.'

" . . . Le Sidaner's trademark motif of a single window lit at dusk reminds one of nothing so much as an Advent calendar on the first day of December.  He is the master of the penumbra, the 'crepuscule' of velvety darkness so soft and thick you could almost touch it, illuminated by a 'clair de lune'  . . .  His palette was anathema to the Pointillists.  If, as Signac insisted, 'the enemy of all paintings is grey,' then Le Sidaner slept with the enemy all his painting life.  It wasn't that he didn't do colour, but that his colours are always diffused in an opal light that falls through the picture space like soft rain.  . . .  'You could blow on this crepuscular vision and it would vanish' the critic of Le Figaro commented on one of his works.  The vision has proved more durable than it looked."

– Laura Gascoigne, extracts from her review of a French exhibition devoted to Le Sidaner (The Spectator, May 10, 2014)

Henri Le Sidaner
The Bridge
1904
oil on canvas
Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco

Henri Le Sidaner
Le Gouter au Jardin
1903
oil on canvas
Ulster Museum, Belfast

Henri Le Sidaner
Grand Trianon
ca. 1905
oil on canvas
Museum of Fine Arts, Boston

Henri Le Sidaner
Une Ruelle, la Nuit
before 1925
oil on canvas
Leeds Art Gallery, West Yorkshire

Henri Le Sidaner
Trafalgar Square
before 1931
pastel on canvas
Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge

Henri Le Sidaner
Courtyard from a Window
ca. 1904-1910
oil on canvas
Manchester Art Gallery

Henri Le Sidaner
Church Street, Villefranches-sur-Mer
ca. 1928
oil on canvas
Museo Thyssen-Bornemisza, Madrid

Henri Le Sidaner
An Italian Lake
before 1933
oil on board
Kirklees Museums and Galleries, West Yorkshire

Henri Le Sidaner
The Pond Garden, Hampton Court
before 1939
oil on panel
Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge

Henri Le Sidaner
La Ronde
1897
lithograph on blue paper
National Gallery of Art, Washington DC