Friday, July 31, 2026

Derivations

attributed to Simone Bianco
Idealized Classical Head
ca. 1540
marble
Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna

Carl Friedrich Lessing
Study of Classical Head
1825
drawing
Cincinnati Art Museum, Ohio

Annibale Carracci
Classical Figure with Vessel
ca. 1595
drawing
Graphische Sammlung Albertina, Vienna

Arvid Fougstedt
Classical Motif
1931
etching
Moderna Museet, Stockholm

Baccio Bandinelli
Frieze of Classical Figures
ca. 1519-25
drawing
Morgan Library, New York

Marcantonio Raimondi after Francesco Francia
Bathing Scene with Classical Frieze Figures
ca. 1510
engraving
Graphische Sammlung Albertina, Vienna

Augustus John
Four Figures in Antique Dress
ca. 1891
drawing
Swindon Museum and Art Gallery, Wiltshire

Johann August Nahl the Younger
Two Women in Classical Draperies
before 1825
drawing
Kupferstichkabinett,
Staatliche Kunstsammlungen, Dresden

Agostino Musi after Giulio Romano
Classical Couple holding Hands
ca. 1515-30
engraving
Graphische Sammlung, ETH Zürich

Anonymous Printmaker after Franz Ludwig Catel
Roman Woman applying Cosmetics, assisted by Slave
ca. 1798
etching
Herzog August Bibliothek, Wulfenbüttel

Salomon Gessner
Classical Vignette for Winckelmann's Letters
ca. 1802-1803
etching
(posthumously printed)
Graphische Sammlung, Zentralbibliothek Zürich

Ciro Ferri
Classical Scene before Enthroned Figure
ca. 1675
drawing
Musée des Beaux-Arts de Lyon

Federico Zuccaro
Classical Scene
(unidentified narrative)
ca. 1580
drawing
Graphische Sammlung Albertina, Vienna

Auguste-Barthélemy Glaize
Study for Classical Figure
ca. 1870
drawing
Musée des Beaux-Arts de Valenciennes

Francisque Millet
Classical Landscape with Water-Carrier
ca. 1660-70
oil on canvas
Landesmuseum, Hannover

Étienne Allegrain
Classical Landscape with Ruins
ca. 1690
oil on canvas
Musée des Beaux-Arts de Lyon

There is another famous passage in the writings of Pliny that also concerns an incomplete figure, but this time the appeal to the imagination is even greater: we hear that Timanthes painted the sacrifice of Iphigenia and expressed the grief of those around her in such a masterly way that when he came to represent her father Agamemnon, he had to suggest the climax of sorrow by representing him with his cloak drawn over his face, an enclosed world within the picture's world, which excited the admiration of the classical orators.  

There is a painting on one of the walls of a Pompeian house that reflects this motif.  It is not a great work of art, and the same criticism applies to many other copies of Greek works found in Italy and elsewhere.  But such criticism has tended to obscure the most astounding consequence of the Greek miracle: the fact that copies were ever made at all to be displayed in the houses and gardens of the educated.  For this industry of making reproductions for sale implies a function of the image of which the pre-Greek world knew nothing.  The image has been pried loose from the practical context for which it was conceived and is admired and enjoyed for its beauty and fame, that is, quite simply within the context of art.  For this is the final consequence of that great "chain reaction."  The creation of an imaginative realm led to an acknowledgement of what we call "art" and the celebration of those rare spirits who could explore and extend that realm.

It may sound paradoxical to say that the Greeks invented art, but from this point of view, it is a mere sober statement of fact.  We rarely realize how much this concept owes to the heroic spirit of those discoverers who were active between 550 and 350 B.C.  For the history of these years as it is reflected in Pliny or Quintilian was handed down like an epic of conquest, a story of inventions.  When Quintilian called the contorted attitude of Myron's Discobolos "particularly praiseworthy for its novelty and difficulty," he codified a standard of criticism that linked art with the solution of problems.  The names of the artists who discovered new effects to increase illusion and lifelikeness, the names of Myron and Phidias, Zeuxis and Apelles, lived on in history and have retained their magic despite the fact we do not know one work from their hands.  The legend of their triumphs remained as potent in the history of Western art as did the actual works that were recovered from the soil.  The writers of the Renaissance echoed the anecdotes that extolled the powers of painting to deceive the eye – the very character which made Plato disapprove of art and prefer the immutable laws of the Egyptian canon. 

– E.H. Gombrich, Art and Illusion: a Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation (Princeton University Press, 1960)