Tuesday, May 31, 2022

Early Titian - Opinions by S.J. Freedberg (II)

Titian
Miracle of the Newborn Child
1511
fresco
Scuola del Santo, Padua

Titian
Miracle of the Healed Foot
1511
fresco
Scuola del Santo, Padua

Titian
Miracle of the Jealous Husband
1511
fresco
Scuola del Santo, Padua

"The breadth of form and of conception that are in the Pastorale, and which indicate emergence to maturity, are also in the three frescoes Titian contributed to the decoration of the Scuola del Santo in Padua (1511), and their handling is still more confident – this, too, an indication of maturity.  But in an important sense the Padua frescoes regress from the accomplishment of the Pastorale.  These barely face the problem of a complex pictorial order that, in the Pastorale, Titian had so brilliantly solved.  There is some comprehensive geometric structure, but the necessity to make narrative seems to recall Titian to the only tradition for it that he knew, the teleri of the late Quattrocento.  The composition of two of the Scuola frescoes shows an accent like theirs, somewhat additive, or even merely accumulative.  The discipline they do have recollects, still more than Sebastiano's barely earlier Crisostomo altar, the older mode of order of Bellini.  The third fresco, the Jealous Husband, refers backward in a very different way, to Titian's own early departure from Bellini, and to his research towards an energy of action that verges in impulsiveness and force on a baroque.  In all three frescoes Titian looks beyond the recent episode of close dependence on Giorgione and links their style and ambition rather to the Adulteress.  In particular, the prescription he had come to there for effects of colour that are at once illusionistic and poetic is repeated here – with astonishing brilliance for the fresco medium; and it is as if this colourism, and the tours de force of description that accompany it, were sufficient to Titian's purposes, without more complicated demonstrations of his machinery of art."

Titian
St Mark enthroned with Saints
ca. 1511
oil on canvas
(altarpiece)
Basilica di Santa Maria della Salute, Venice

Titian
Gypsy Madonna
ca. 1511
oil on panel
Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna

"The St. Mark altar (Venice, S. Maria della Salute, c. 1511) is closely related in style to the main fresco at the Santo, the Miracle of the Newborn Child, but even more than there its order recalls the perspective-deduced aesthetic of the Quattrocento.  Yet it has visibly been brought up to date: simple but efficient devices relate forms towards unity in pattern and make connexions in their disposition in space, and the very density of form suggests its unity.  Decisively unlike the Quattrocento precedents (and more than in a partial model, Giorgione's Castelfranco altar) the conception of the picture begins with the substances it represents, not with the projection of their space.  There is another bridge between two tastes – in effect Bellini's and Giorgione's – in the descriptive mode.  Titian's force and degree of literalness in his description of the figures is like that in the Santo frescoes, and, as there, there is a visible concession to Giorgione's precedent of regularizing form.  But there is no wish thereby to reshape appearance into ideality, as there had been in the moment of the Pastorale.  Appearance is reformed, just adequately, towards classical proportion, but mainly to increase its sensuous attractiveness, which is further magnified by effects of texture and by the sheer magnetism Titian makes with coloured light.  His devices are at a measurably different level of development, disciplined and subject to exact control, but Titian's basic intentions for his art are not different from those of his first years.  In the Gypsy Madonna (Vienna, Kunsthistorisches Museum), which must be virtually identical in date with the St Mark altar, the effect of sensuous existence Titian makes by his command of optical devices is of an extreme virtuosity.  No picture before this attains a comparable sense of presences existing palpably within an atmosphere, reflecting coloured light but also absorbing it to saturation point, so that each pore of flesh or drapery makes texture.  The proposition is not new in Titian, but its sophisticated, utterly authoritative execution is: to a new degree the optical illusion of existence is so powerfully intense that it transcends the existence it describes, and assumes the status of idea – of sheerly pictorial, aesthetic fact, more than it is the counterfeit of a fact of nature.  This vibrant presence is affirmed, in the Gypsy Madonna, of figures which, more evidently than in the St Mark altar, depend in physical canon on the example of the late Giorgione, of harmonious fullness and slow gravity of form.  A corresponding effect of charged, grave harmony is in the mood of persons and setting that the picture illustrates.  With the difference that results from Titian's greater sensuousness, this mood – like that of the Pastorale – deliberately perpetuates the temper of Giorgione."

Titian
Noli me Tangere
1511-12
oil on canvas
National Gallery, London

Titian
Madonna and Child with St Anthony of Padua and St Roch
(Freedberg identifies St Anthony as St Francis)
ca. 1511
oil on canvas
Museo del Prado, Madrid

Titian
Three Ages of Man
ca. 1512-13
oil on canvas
Scottish National Gallery, Edinburgh

"It is less likely that Titian is, now, referring back directly to Giorgione than that he is recalling his own translation of Giorgione in the Pastorale.  This appears to be the case in the Noli me Tangere (London, National Gallery, 1511-12), where the motif of posture in the Christ and the principle of composition are deduced from the earlier picture.  Despite the difference of subject the tenor of communication continues the poetic Giorgionismo of the Pastorale, but the poetic temper is a little sharper, less immersed in the atmosphere of dream.  This is occasioned by more than the requirements of subject: in general, in the Noli me Tangere there is the evidence of the working of a more precise sensibility, articulated by a finer, still more virtuoso touch.  The elements of awkwardness or of aggressive stress that had been frequent in Titian's juvenilia (and of which there is a trace even in the Pastorale) are gone.  Forms assume a more fluent grace, and the cursive action of the brush is so swift and exact as to suggest a sleight-of-hand.  This is a further revision away from Giorgionesque example, but the affiliation is still eminently visible.  It may be less so in the small Madonna with St Roch and St Francis (Madrid, Prado, c. 1511) [Freedberg identifies St Anthony of Padua as St Francis], for despite the variant in it of a Giorgionesque mood, the main meaning of the picture is its painterly experience of vision, as it was accessible only to Titian and demonstrable only by him at this time.  As the forms of the Noli me Tangere are the projections of a more refined sensibility, so are the behaviour of light and colour here and the subtlety and brilliance of their transcription.  It is this latter aspect of the picture, not its Giorgionism, that is significant for the next few years to come in Titian's career.  The subject matter of the Three Ages of Man (Edinburgh, National Gallery, Ellesmere Loan, c. 1512-13) still commands affiliation with Giorgione, or rather with Titian's personal precedent of a Giorgionism in the Pastorale; but it is true in substance that the few pictures we discussed previously, and would date 1511 and early 1512, represent a brief and only partial renewal of dependence on Giorgione.   What succeeds these is a series of works that reasserts Titian's distinction in vision and temperament from the older master.  He seems almost to turn back across the intervening episodes of Giorgionismo to link up with his own accomplishment as it had been towards 1508 or 1509, about the time of the Adulteress."   

Titian
Madonna with St John the Baptist and a Donor
ca. 1512
oil on panel, transferred to canvas
Scottish National Gallery, Edinburgh

Titian
Holy Family with a Shepherd
ca. 1512-13
oil on canvas
National Gallery, London

Titian
Madonna with St John the Baptist and a Donor
ca. 1513-14
oil on canvas
Alte Pinakothek, Munich

Titian
Madonna with Two Saints and a Donor
(Balbi Madonna with St Catherine and St Dominic)
ca. 1514-15
oil on canvas
Fondazione Magnani Rocca, near Parma

Titian
Madonna with St George and St Dorothy
(Freedberg identifies as St Ulfus and St Bridget)
ca. 1515
oil on panel
Museo del Prado, Madrid

Titian
Sacra Conversazione
ca. 1515-16
oil on panel
Gemäldegalerie Alte Meister, Dresden

"Refinement of form and fluency of composition distinguish the Madonna with St John the Baptist and a Donor (Edinburgh, National Gallery, Ellesmere Loan, c. 1512) from similar themes by Titian of a few years earlier, but there is no doubt of the continuity of idea and essential concerns between them; and this is true also of the Holy Family with a Shepherd (London, National Gallery, c. 1512-13).  Conspicuous among the continuities is a concern to exploit the brilliance of colours and reflected lights on draperies.  In these pictures Titian reasserts a former tendency to descriptive literalism in the rendering of drapery and carries it much farther than before, apparently to give himself the opportunity to make virtuoso illusion, but even  more to make a maximum of complex brilliance of reflected light.  The look of literalness and the broken patterning of drapery intrude a note of archaism into conceptions that are otherwise advanced, and reinforce the link – almost always somewhere evident in young Titian – with the style of Bellini.  In this respect these works seem somewhat regressive, and they are aberrant in Titian's evolution of these years, but only in the degree to which Titian has permitted himself for a brief while to confuse the aim of expression made by optical devices with the objective facts of optical experience."

"The tendency persists in the Madonna with Two Saints and a Donor (Genoa, Balbi Collection, c. 1514-15) [now Fondazione Magnani Rocca near Parma], where the Madonna serves almost as a lay figure on which to arrange a cascade of elaborately complicated drapery.  The brilliance of her display is still more heightened by relief against a contrasting dark hanging behind the Madonna, recalling an earlier device of Titian's, as in the Gypsy Madonna.  The archaistic accent of the drapery pattern is less than in the Ellesmere or the London pictures, but the emphasis on literal illusion remains very strong.  This element of literalness is not quite reconciled with the grand artificiality of the Madonna's pose, or with the generous impulse of movement Titian instils into the composition, or the large clarity of balance among its forms.  The Madonna with St Ulfus and St Bridget [Madonna with St George and St Dorothy] (Madrid, Prado, c. 1515) displays the same compulsion to make demonstration of illusionism with the draperies, but with an important change, which stems from the intention which had re-emerged in the Balbi Madonna and which is concerned with the inventive rather than the imitative means of art.  Realizing that fine complexities of description cannot be reconciled with large effects of human presence and pictorial idea, Titian diminishes the former in the drapery style of the Ulfus Madonna, reducing the angular facetings that had given an accent of archaism.  His patterning of drapery becomes again, much as it had been at an earlier time, more cursive, and this impulse of cursive patterning pervades the composition.  The grand dimension of the Madonna of the Balbi picture is given now to all the figures, and they are drawn together to make a dense pictorial substance, interwoven by large movements of continuous rhythm.  The sense of breadth and unity of form are new in Titian's career in the degree in which he achieves them here.  By the time of the Sacra Conversazione in Dresden (Gallery, c. 1515-16) it is evident that he is close to a new stage of maturity in the evolution of a classical style in his Venetian terms.  Effects of sheer illusion are still more diminished to become, in a deepened chiaroscuro, more evidently the poetic effects of the painter's art; and these are in a context of pictorial order that is concentrated and monumental, scanned by large rhythms, and of fluent ease."     

– S.J. Freedberg, Painting in Italy 1500-1600 in the Pelican History of Art series (1970)

Monday, May 30, 2022

Early Titian - Opinions by S.J. Freedberg (I)

Titian
Birth of Adonis
ca. 1507-1508
oil on panel
(from a cassone)
Musei degli Eremitani, Padua

Titian
Legend of Polydorus
ca. 1507-1508
oil on panel
(from a cassone)
Musei degli Eremitani, Padua

Titian
Orpheus and Eurydice
ca. 1508
oil on canvas
Accademia Carrara, Bergamo

"We have observed that from the middle of the sixteenth century Titian's polemic admirers, and probably Titian himself, felt it necessary to add to his vast glory, aiding the work of time that, by then, had outmoded the accomplishment of Giorgione and obscured his role in forming the young Titian's art.  The nature of Titian's relationship with Giorgione is fairly clear, however, and there is no doubt that essential elements of Titian's style derive from the older master.  . . .  The earliest certain works by Titian, of 1507-8, have evidently been formed from a conception of expression and vision that derives from the experience of Giorgione.  The two cassone panels with the Birth of Adonis and the Legend of Polydorus (Padua) and the Orpheus and Eurydice (Bergamo) depend on Giorgione's imagery, and on his demonstration of an integral communication made by human actors and their landscape setting.  They derive another unity from Giorgione of the whole pictorial texture that results from his demonstration of what we have called his optical mode.  Yet these pictures are specifically unlike Giorgione: they are less cautious in small forms and less deliberated in their larger design, and the optical element in them is also less controlled.  On the contrary, Titian's visual responses are set down in a way that intensifies their energy and brilliance."    

attributed to Titian (by Freedberg)
Lucretia
ca. 1508
oil on canvas
Royal Collection, Hampton Court

"The Lucretia at Hampton Court, of about the same time, shows the latter quality on a larger scale, in luminous drapery and in the textured radiance of the nude female figure.  Here the liberty to generalize and reshape form largely and cursively is after Giorgione's example, but Titian's purpose in its use diverges markedly from Giorgione's.  Titian shapes the nude to give new stress to its physicality and to its sensuality; his subjective liberty of representing is not used, like Giorgione's, to abstract from sensuous existence but to affirm it.  Titian, too, deals with the idea, not just with the objective record of appearance, but that idea is of the magnified intensity of sensuous experience –  of physical being and its vitality, revealed to the powers of sight."  [The Lucretia was acquired in the late 1620s by Charles I when he purchased a large portion of the Gonzaga Collection from Mantua.  Curators at the Royal Collection currently attribute the painting to Titian's older brother, Francesco Vecellio, and date it to about 1530.]  

Titian
Rustic Idyll
ca. 1507-1508
oil on panel
Harvard Art Museums

Titian
St George
ca. 1507-1508
oil on panel
Fondazione Giorgio Cini, Venice

"Among all the juvenilia of Titian the St George (Venice, Cini Collection, also 1507-08) may demonstrate this most remarkably.  The image of the Saint is generated from the precedents of Giorgione, and evokes a mood related to his; but this is differently immediate and vital.  The armour of the Saint is taken as occasion for a turbulence of light, which saturates surrounding colour and infuses the contrasting darks.  The brush records the brilliance of light and the texturing vibration that it makes on surfaces with a rough energy of hand.  Beyond what it reveals of physical being, light is in itself sensuous experience for Titian, and he sees it as alive and yet more complexly charged with energy than the bodily factors of existence are.  This light, and the colour it creates, is more than a record of a visual fact.  It begins in the seeing of reality, but that seeing is then charged with the energies, the passion, and the poetic power to enlarge experience that is in the artist.  Part of the subjective component in this mode of vision is in the manual action by which it is set down, and this is, more than in Giorgione, revolutionary in its liberty."

attributed to Titian (by Freedberg)
Adoration of the Shepherds
(the Allendale Nativity)
ca. 1506
oil on panel
National Gallery of Art, Washington DC

"This is the poetic enlargement of a sensuous experience, and a partial transmutation of it in an ideal sense, but the root in that experience and tie to it are evident as never in Giorgione; and they are an indication of Titian's earliest artistic origins.  Where (as I see it) Giorgione detached himself from an early education in Bellini's shop, and found his threshold for a new style in an intellectualizing late Quattrocento classicism in Emilia, Titian's threshold was, directly, his Bellinesque education, primarily concerned with the depiction of physical and visual reality.  The Allendale Nativity (Washington, National Gallery, 1506?) is, I believe, a step yet farther back in Titian's history towards his beginnings in Bellini's style.  In the Allendale Nativity, only symptoms distinguish its manner of painting from Bellini's, but these show the peculiar intensity of visual response that we find in Titian later.  Perhaps still more significant, the structure of the picture seeks on the one hand a liberty, and on the other a cohesiveness, that belong to the mentality of Cinquecento style."  [Curators at the National Gallery currently attribute the so-called Allendale Nativity to Giorgione rather than to Titian.]

Titian
Madonna and Child
ca. 1508
oil on panel
Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York

Titian
Christ and the Adulteress
ca. 1509
oil on canvas (cut down)
Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum, Glasgow

Titian
Christ and the Adulteress (fragment)
ca. 1509
oil on canvas
(cut away from original canvas)
Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum, Glasgow

"In the Christ and the Adulteress (Glasgow, c. 1509) Titian's new command of larger form is evident, but his intention for it is conspicuously unlike Giorgione's.  No earlier work so powerfully asserts sheer physical existence, for the substance of the figures is described with almost exaggerated fullness, and they are made to move with heavy urgency, almost lunging towards one another.  And, in addition, Titian has developed a remarkable technique for recording their surfaces of drapery and flesh, more controlled than his handling in the smaller works of pervious years and more literally illusionistic.  The garments show strong fields of colour, saturated with intense light, and this is a reaffirming of a quattrocentesque strain, but the very force of the illusion transcends normal expectation and experience of reality.  And there is a dualism in the working of this light-saturated colour: even while apprehending what it objectively describes, the eye and mind perceive it also as a separate, non-descriptive power, as an abstract and subjective aesthetic effect.  Titian's purposes are not yet synthetically resolved.  What is in the effortful and vital physicality of the Adulteress, and in its strain of painterly illusionism, explores conceptions on the basis of which a baroque style might be made; but the simultaneous value of abstraction in the colour tends more towards that ideality of a classical style.  The character of structure in the picture tends the same way.  The figures move too urgently to accept the discipline of contrapposto, but they are connected in a formally deliberated cursive rhythm, and set out in a scheme of mobile reciprocal balances that accords with the compositional innovations of the classical style.  No precedent survives for such an extended classicizing order as this that we can give certainly to Giorgione, but there is a close analogy to the design of Sebastiano del Piombo's Judgment of Solomon (Kingston Lacy, Bankes Collection, 1508, probably antecedent to the Adulteress), in the invention of which Giorgione may have been involved.  But since the classical order of larger design follows out of that of the single figures, Titian's accomplishment in the Adulteress evolves out of a discipline he had learned, especially through the frescoes on the Fondaco, from Giorgione's classical style."

Sebastiano del Piombo
Judgment of Solomon
1508
oil on canvas (unfinished)
National Trust, Kingston Lacy, Dorset

attributed to Titian (by Freedberg)
Christ carrying the Cross
ca. 1509-1510
oil on panel
Scuola Grande di San Rocco, Venice

attributed to Titian (by Freedberg)
Christ carrying the Cross
ca. 1509-1510
oil on panel
(lunette a later product of Titian's workshop)
Scuola Grande di San Rocco, Venice

"An ancient confusion exists about the authorship of the Christ carrying the Cross (Venice, S. Rocco), which Vasari gives in different places to Giorgione and to Titian.  It seems to us to indicate a moment of Titian's evolution just following the Adulteress, in which he moves more deliberately and still more imitatively into the orbit of Giorgione's style.  Muting his aggressive energy, Titian seeks more discipline as he matures, and accepts Giorgione's authority for the means by which it may be achieved.  In the Portacroce Titian comes close to Giorgione's purity of form and approximates the tone of feeling he evolved towards 1508.  The assimilation of Giorgione is to the point of giving good grounds for confusion, but Titian's personal accent, of a specificity unlike Giorgione's in description and in mood, is still there."  

attributed to Titian (by Freedberg)
Pastorale
(Pastoral Concert)
ca. 1510-1511
oil on canvas
Musée du Louvre

"The Portacroce, of 1509 or 1510, dates from within Giorgione's lifetime, and it is evidence of a still learning, literal, dependence on that master.  The Pastorale (Paris, Louvre) represents to us another, more advanced stage of Titian's relationship to Giorgione: it is no longer imitation, but a demonstration of creation in Giorgione's style, according to his most advanced precept and in a stature that resembles his.  The painting should be, by my calculation, of late 1510 or 1511, just following Giorgione's death, and it is as if Titian were determined in it to deny Giorgione's mortality, perpetuating the life of his idea.  In every respect of the working of the hand and eye in it the Pastorale is Titian's, and so is the repertory of forms and their precise morphology; but the idea and emotion – more truly the idea is an emotion – are one with Giorgione.  The theme recalls the essence of the early Tempesta (apart from any possible overlay of identifiable literary meaning, either in that picture or in this), but it has been articulated with a resonance and depth like those of Giorgione's latest years.  Not only Titian's own maturing but a willed consonance in him with the departed master's thought has finally produced in Titian a classical restraint upon his powers of asserting presence, and imposed continence – even Giorgionesque indirection – on his expressive mode."  [Scholarly consensus currently suggests the Pastorale or Pastoral Concert was most plausibly begun by Giorgione and completed after his death by Titian.]

Anonymous Photographer
Installation View at the Louvre
(Titian's/Giorgione's Pastoral Concert hung beside the Mona Lisa)
1929
L'Illustration (Parisian newspaper)

Giorgione
La Tempesta
ca. 1505
oil on canvas
Gallerie dell'Accademia, Venice
 

Sunday, May 29, 2022

Venetian Painters Allied to Titian's Studio

Damiano Mazza
Abduction of Ganymede
1575
oil on canvas
National Gallery, London

Francesco Vecellio
Mystic Marriage of St Catherine
ca. 1520-40
oil on canvas
Royal Collection, Great Britain

Francesco Vecellio
Adoration of the Shepherds
ca. 1519-26
oil on canvas
Museum of Fine Arts, Houston

"Titian's brother, Francesco Vecellio, is conspicuous for the small profit his relationship with Titian brought him.  A few years Titian's senior (born probably in the mid or later 1480s), his beginning as a painter was set back by service as a soldier.  We know no work of his before the first years of the second decade.  . . .  From the first he seems to have been content to accept the role of follower of his brother to which his closeness of relationship and distance in talent had condemned him.  On occasion the working connexion between Francesco and Titian seems to have been close, and Francesco may even at times have performed the functions of a shop assistant."

– S.J. Freedberg, Painting in Italy 1500-1600 in the Pelican History of Art series (1970)

Marco Vecellio
Scene in the Venetian Mint
ca. 1590
oil on canvas
(installed on ceiling)
Sala del Senato, Palazzo Ducale, Venice

Marco Vecellio
Scene in the Venetian Mint (detail)
ca. 1590
oil on canvas
(installed on ceiling)
Sala del Senato, Palazzo Ducale, Venice

Gaspare Narvesa
St Andrew, St Mark, St Jerome
1597
oil on canvas
Chiesa di Santa Maria Annunziata, Mel

Polidoro da Lanciano
Adoration of the Magi
ca. 1540-60
oil on canvas
Galleria Estense, Modena

Polidoro da Lanciano
Adoration of the Magi (detail)
ca. 1540-60
oil on canvas
Galleria Estense, Modena

Polidoro da Lanciano
Adoration of the Magi (detail)
ca. 1540-60
oil on canvas
Galleria Estense, Modena

Polidoro da Lanciano
Christ and the Woman taken in Adultery
ca. 1540-45
oil on canvas
Pinacoteca Tosio Martinengo, Brescia

Polidoro da Lanciano
Mystic Marriage of St Catherine
before 1565
oil on panel
Pinacoteca Egidio Martini, Ca' Rezzonico, Venice

Polidoro da Lanciano
Virgin and Child with St Mark and St Peter
ca. 1535-40
oil on canvas
Walters Art Museum, Baltimore

Polidoro da Lanciano
Virgin and Child with St Catherine and St Jerome
ca. 1540-60
oil on canvas
Courtauld Gallery, London

Polidoro da Lanciano
Rest on the Return from Egypt, with St John the Baptist
ca. 1530
oil on canvas
Musée du Louvre
 
Alec Cobbe
Interior of Titian's Studio in Venice
2010
acrylic on board
National Trust, Hatchlands, Surrey


Saturday, May 28, 2022

Marco di Giovan Battista, called Marco Pino (1521-1583)

Marco Pino after Parmigianino
Martyrdom of St John and St Paul
(4th-century pair of Roman martyrs)
ca. 1544
oil on canvas
Palazzo Chigi Zondadari, Siena

Marco Pino after Parmigianino
Martyrdom of St John and St Paul (detail)
ca. 1544
oil on canvas
Palazzo Chigi Zondadari, Siena

Marco Pino
The Resurrection
ca. 1555
oil on canvas
Galleria Borghese, Rome

Marco Pino
The Resurrection (detail)
ca. 1555
oil on canvas
Galleria Borghese, Rome

Marco Pino
The Resurrection (detail)
ca. 1555
oil on canvas
Galleria Borghese, Rome

Marco Pino
The Resurrection (detail)
ca. 1555
oil on canvas
Galleria Borghese, Rome

Marco Pino
Battle of Nude Men
ca. 1545-50
drawing
Los Angeles County Museum of Art

Marco Pino and Pellegrino Tibaldi
Ornamental Ignudi
ca. 1550
vault fresco
Cappella di Lucrezia della Rovere,
Chiesa della Santissima Trinità dei Monti, Rome

Marco Pino and Pellegrino Tibaldi
Ornamental Ignudi
ca. 1550
vault fresco
Cappella di Lucrezia della Rovere,
Chiesa della Santissima Trinità dei Monti, Rome

Marco Pino
Holy Family with St John the Baptist
ca. 1560
oil on canvas
private collection

attributed to Marco Pino
St Peter
ca. 1550-55
oil on canvas
Galleria Borghese, Rome

Marco Pino
The Crucifixion
with St Catherine of Siena
and St John the Evangelist

ca. 1570
oil on panel
Getty Museum, Los Angeles

Marco Pino
Study for the Magdalen beneath the Cross
ca. 1550-75
drawing
Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum

Marco Pino
Study for the Assumption of the Virgin
before 1583
drawing
Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York

Anonymous Printmaker after Marco Pino
Perseus beheading Medusa
ca. 1550-1600
chiaroscuro woodcut
Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York

"Marco di Giovan Battista (known as Marco Pino after his father's native village of Costalpino) was born in Siena in 1521.   It was there, in about 1536-37, that Pino began his apprenticeship in the workshop of Domenico Beccafumi (1484-1551), the leading artist in the city.  Alongside his master, he worked on major projects, such as the frescoes depicting the Assumption of the Virgin for the main chapel of the Duomo of Siena.  In his early twenties, Pino moved to Rome and was soon charged with some of the most high-profile commissions in the capital, including decorations for Palazzo Farnese and the Sala Paolina in Castel Sant'Angelo.  These experiences allowed Pino to study the works of Raphael and Michelangelo closely, and to learn from and collaborate with leading artists of the day, notably Perino del Vaga (1501-1547) and Daniele da Volterra (1509-1566).  Around 1552 Pino moved to Naples in an attempt to distinguish his own name, clientele, and workshop.  While his Roman years had been characterized by large collaborative projects consisting mainly of frescoes, in Naples Pino specialized in the production of altarpieces.  Between 1568 and 1570, he returned for a brief period to Rome before eventually moving back to Naples, where he ran his own prolific studio until his death in 1583."  

– from a biographical sketch at the Getty Museum, Los Angeles