Saturday, November 16, 2024

Ignatius Loyola (Pictures and Words)

Julian Schnabel
Ignatius of Loyola
1987
oil on canvas
Museum Ludwig, Cologne

Gérard Audran after Peter Paul Rubens
Three Demons beating St Ignatius Loyola
ca. 1680
etching
British Museum

Francesco Bertos
St Ignatius Loyola
ca. 1722
bronze statuette
Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York

Elias Christoph Heiss after Andreas Wolff
St Ignatius Loyola
1696
mezzotint (thesis sheet)
Art Institute of Chicago

Domenico Zampieri
Christ and God the Father at La Storta
(Vision of St Ignatius Loyola)

ca. 1622
oil on canvas
Los Angeles County Museum of Art

Domenico Piola
Christ and God the Father at La Storta
(Vision of St Ignatius Loyola)

ca. 1690-1700
drawing
Museum Kunstpalast, Düsseldorf

Andrea Pozzo
Triumph of St Ignatius Loyola
1685-90
illusionistic vault fresco
Chiesa di Sant' Ignazio di Loyola, Rome

Girolamo Frezza and Arnold van Westerhout
after Andrea Pozzo
Triumph of St Ignatius Loyola
1702
engraving of vault fresco
British Museum

Peter Paul Rubens
St Ignatius Loyola
ca. 1620-22
oil on canvas
Norton Simon Museum, Pasadena

Peter Paul Rubens
Miracles of St Ignatius Loyola
ca. 1617-18
oil on canvas
Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna

Peter Paul Rubens
Miracles of St Ignatius Loyola
1619
oil on panel
Dulwich Picture Gallery, London

Guercino (Giovanni Francesco Barbieri)
St Gregory the Great
with St Ignatius Loyola and St Francis Xavier

ca. 1625-26
oil on canvas
National Gallery, London

Antonio Balestra
Virgin and Child in Glory
adored by St Ignatius Loyola and St Stanislaus Kostka

ca. 1731
oil on canvas
Pinacoteca Nazionale di Bologna

Bartolomeo Gennari
The Crucifixion
with the Virgin, St John the Evangelist,
St Francis of Assisi and St Ignatius Loyola

1637
oil on canvas
Collegiata di Santa Maria Maggiore, Pieve di Cento

John Faber the Younger after Titian
Portrait of Ignatius Loyola (reputed)
1755
lithograph
Scottish National Gallery, Edinburgh

Luc Tuymans
Hell
(as described by St Ignatius Loyola
in The Spiritual Exercises)
2007
lithograph
British Museum

"The Jesuits, as we know, have contributed much to forming our notion of literature.  The heirs and propagators of Latin rhetoric, through teaching, over which they had in the past, to all intents and purposes, a monopoly in Europe, they left bourgeois France with the concept of "fine writing," censure of which is still frequently confounded with the image of literary creation we set up.  However, the Jesuits stubbornly deny to their founder's book this literary prestige they have helped to establish: the exposition of the Exercises is said to be "disconcerting," "curious," "bizarre"; "it is all labored," one Father writes, "literarily impoverished. The author has tried merely to provide the most just expression, the most exact transmission posible to the Society of Jesus, and thereby, to the Church, of the gift which he himself had received from God."  Here we find once more the old modern myth according to which language is merely the docile and insignificant instrument for the serious things that occur in the spirit, the heart or the soul.  This myth is not innocent; discrediting the form serves to exalt the importance of the content: to say: I write badly means: I think well.  Classical ideology practices in the cultural order the same economy as bourgeois democracy does in the political order: a separation and balance of powers, a broad but closely watched territory is conceded to literature, on condition that the territory be isolated, hierarchically, from other domains; thus it is that literature, whose function is a worldly one, is not compatible with spirituality; one is detour, ornament, veil, the other is immediation, nudity: this is why one cannot be both a saint and a writer.  Purified of any contact with the seductions and illusions of form, Ignatius's text, it is suggested, is barely language: it is the simple, neuter path which assures the transmission of a mental experience.  Thus once again the place our society assigns to language is confirmed: decoration or instrument, it is seen as a sort of parasite of the human subject, who uses it or dons it at a distance, like an ornament or tool picked up and laid down according to the needs of subjectivity or the conformities of sociality."  

– Roland Barthes, from Sade, Fourier, Loyola (1971), translated by Richard Miller (Hill and Wang, 1976)