Tuesday, February 21, 2023

Portrait-Making (Literal and Fanciful) - X

Jean-Louis Laneuville
Portrait of Jean Debry
ca. 1793
oil on canvas
Eskenazi Museum of Art,
Indiana University, Bloomington

Jean-Baptiste Greuze
Portrait of writer Louis-Sébastien Mercier
1792
drawing
Château de Versailles

Henri-Pierre Danloux
Portrait of a Young Man
1791
drawing
Musée du Louvre

Samuel De Wilde
Richard Wilson as Sir Francis Wronghead
in The Provok'd Husband by Colley Cibber

ca. 1790
oil on canvas
Holburne Museum, Bath

François-André Vincent
Study of a Young Women
ca. 1790
drawing
Musée du Louvre

Thomas Gainsborough
Portrait of Mary, Lady Bate-Dudley
ca. 1787
oil on canvas
Tate Britain

Thomas Gainsborough
Portrait of Sir Edward Swinburne
1785
oil on canvas
Detroit Institute of Arts

Henri-Pierre Danloux
Portrait of a Young Woman
ca. 1785
drawing
Musée du Louvre

Élisabeth Vigée-Lebrun
Study of a Girl wearing a Veil
1785
drawing
Musée du Louvre

Samuel De Wilde
Joseph George Holman as Chamont
in The Orphan by Thomas Otway

1785
oil on canvas
Museum of London

Gilbert Stuart
Family Portrait
ca. 1783-93
oil on canvas
Indianapolis Museum of Art

Joshua Reynolds
Portrait of Miss Elizabeth Keppel,
later Mrs Thomas Meyrick

1782
oil on canvas
Ashmolean Museum, Oxford

Thomas Gainsborough
Portrait of John, 5th Viscount Downe
1781
oil on canvas
Cincinnati Museum of Art, Ohio

Jens Juel
Portrait of Juliana Margaretta Waltersdorff
ca. 1780-90
oil on canvas
Hylands House, Chelmsford, Essex

George Romney
Anne Townshend, Marchioness Townshend
ca. 1780
oil on canvas
Indianapolis Museum of Art

George Romney
Lieutenant-Colonel Sir Charles Stuart
1779
oil on canvas
Glasgow Museums

"Major cultural developments tend to entail significant changes in the relationship between art and its audience.  Since the mid-seventeenth century the development of a literate middle class in Europe had been a factor of growing influence in the development of artistic culture.  In the second half of the eighteenth century the modern form of art's relationship to its audience finally came to dominate in the cultures of the principal European countries.  One telling expression of this relationship was the growth of a market in which works of art could be traded as commodities.  Another was the growth of a sophisticated aesthetic literature addressed primarily to the emotional effects of works of visual art, rather than to their religious or historical or mythological references.  It was in its capacity both to make significant choices between comparable goods and to articulate a range of emotional effects that the constituency in question established its distinctive competences." 

"In doing so, that constituency marked the clear alignment of its interests with those basic material and economic forces which bore directly upon the circumstances and character of modern artistic production.  These were such as to reveal a growing contradiction between the traditional values cited in support of art's cultural standing and the actual conditions under which works of art were now produced and paid for.  However central Christian mythology remained to notions of elevated subject-matter, the Church was virtually inconsiderable as a source of patronage in late eighteenth-century France, Germany and England, while however determinedly the status of history painting was upheld in the academies, it formed a small percentage of the wares on show in their exhibitions and had little effective presence in the market-place.  As Gainsborough knew only too well, the one secure means for a painter to earn a living was through commissions for portraits."     

– Charles Harrison, Paul Wood and Jason Gaiger, from Art in Theory, 1648-1815 (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000)