Sunday, August 2, 2026

Visual Preferences (20th Century: 1947)

Constantin Alajalov
Opera Electricians
1947
tempera on paper
Dallas Museum of Art

Harold Allen
Inez, Graceland Cemetery, Chicago
1947
gelatin silver print
Art Institute of Chicago

Morris Berd
Nature Study
1947
oil on canvas
Barnes Foundation, Philadelphia

Max Ernst
Design in Nature
1947
oil on canvas
Menil Collection, Houston

M.C. Escher
Other World
1947
wood-engraving
Kunstmuseum, The Hague

Alberto Giacometti
Standing Figure
1947
oil on canvas
Nasher Sculpture Center, Dallas

Adolph Gottlieb
New York Night Scene
1947
oil and sand on board
Lowe Art Museum, University of Miami

Fernand Léger
Landscape, Blue Background
1947
oil on canvas
Menil Collection, Houston

Henri Matisse
Composition, Green Background
1947
painted paper collage on paper
Menil Collection, Houston

Wright Morris
Front Room reflected in Mirror,
the Home Place, near Norfolk, Nebraska

1947
gelatin silver print
Art Institute of Chicago

Piet Ouborg
The Sign
1947
oil on canvas
Kunstmuseum, The Hague

Grace Robertson
Bebop - Sherries Dance Hall, Brighton
1947
gelatin silver print
Loeb Art Center, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, New York

Mark Rothko
Number 26
1947
oil on canvas
Dallas Museum of Art

John Sennhauser
Colorforms in Colorspace #1
1947
oil on canvas
Dallas Museum of Art

Carl Sprinchorn
Potato Field in Lightning Storm
1947
oil on canvas
Portland Museum of Art, Maine

Max Yavno
Garage Doors
1947
gelatin silver print
Art Institute of Chicago

from Dichtung und Wahrheit (An Unwritten Poem)

                                                              XI
In the old days, a poet normally wrote in the third person, and his normal subject was the deeds of others. The use of the first person he reserved for invoking the Muse or reminding his Prince that it was pay-day; even then, he spoke, not as himself, but in his professional capacity as a bard.

                                                              XII
So long as a poet speaks of the deeds of others, his poem may be bad but it cannot be untrue, even if the deeds are legendary, not historical fact. When, in the old days, a poet told how a stripling of nine stone challenged to mortal combat a firedrake weighing twenty tons, or how a rascal stole the Bishop's horse, cuckolded the Grand Vizier and escaped from jail disguised as a washerwoman, it never occurred to anyone in his audience to think: – "Well, his verses may be all very fine or funny, but was the warrior as brave or the rogue as cunning as he says?": their deeds made common sense of his syllabic spell.

                                                               XIII
So long as he speaks of the deeds of others, a poet has no difficulty in deciding what style of speech to adopt: a heroic deed calls for a "high" style, a deed of comic cunning for a "low" style, etc.
     But suppose there had been no Homer so that Hector and Achilles were forced to write the Iliad themselves in the first person. If what they wrote were in all other respects the poem as we know it, should we not think: – "Genuine heroes do not speak about their deeds in this grand way. These fellows must be play-acting." But, if it is inappropriate for a hero to speak of his own deeds in a grand style, in what style may he appropriately speak? A Comic? Shall we not then suspect him of false modesty?

– W.H. Auden (1959)