Tuesday, October 11, 2022

Amaury-Duval and Paul Chenavard - "the master's disciples"

Amaury-Duval
Portrait of Alice Ozy
1852
oil on canvas
Musée Carnavalet, Paris

Amaury-Duval
Portrait of Mademoiselle Isaure Chasseriau
1838
oil on canvas
Musée des Beaux-Arts de Rennes

Amaury-Duval
Portrait of Marie Marguerite Foucher de Circé
1842
oil on canvas
Musée Sainte-Croix, Poitiers

Amaury-Duval
Portrait of Madame de Loynes
1862
oil on canvas
Musée d'Orsay, Paris

Amaury-Duval
Head of Annunciatory Angel
1865
oil on canvas
Musée Ingres, Montauban

Amaury-Duval
Birth of Venus
1863
oil on canvas
Palais des Beaux-Arts de Lille

Amaury-Duval
Studies
ca. 1875
oil on canvas
Musée des Beaux-Arts de Saint-Denis, Reims

Amaury-Duval
Self Portrait
1832
oil on canvas
Musée des Beaux-Arts de Rennes

"At this point, my friend, I am very much afraid that I am forced to lay hands on one of your idols.  I want to speak of the school of Ingres in general, and of his method as applied to the portrait in particular.  Not all his pupils have strictly and humbly followed their master's precepts.  Whereas M. Amaury-Duval courageously pushes the asceticism of the school to extremes, M. Lehmann makes some attempts to excuse the origin of his pictures by the admixture of alien ingredients.  On the whole one might say that [Ingres's] teaching has been despotic, and that it has left a painful scar on French painting.  A very stubborn man, gifted with several precious faculties, but determined to deny the utility of those which he does not possess, he has laid claim to an extraordinary and exceptional glory – that of extinguishing the sun.  As for the few smoky embers that are still left to wander in space, the master's disciples have undertaken to stamp them out.  It is not to be denied that Nature, as expressed by these simplifiers, has turned out to seem more intelligible; but it is obvious how much less beautiful and exciting she has become in the process. I am bound to admit that I have seen a few portraits by MM. Flandrin and Amaury-Duval which, though falsely disguised as paintings, nevertheless offered some admirable specimens of modelling.  I will even admit that the visible character of these portraits, save everything relating to colour and light, was vigorously and carefully expressed, and in a penetrating manner.  But I ask you if it is playing fair to decrease the difficulties of art by suppressing some of its parts.  I think that M. Chenavard is more courageous and more frank.  He has simply repudiated colour as a perilous display, as a reprehensible, emotional element, and has put his trust in the pencil alone to express all the import of his idea.  M. Chenavard is incapable of denying all the advantages conferred upon laziness by a procedure which consists in expressing the form of an object without the variously-coloured light which clings to each of its molecules; only he claims that this sacrifice is a glorious and a useful one, and that form and idea are both equally the gainers.  But M. Ingres's pupils have very pointlessly retained a semblance of colour.  They believe, or they pretend to believe, that they are painters."

– from The Salon of 1859, published in Art in Paris, 1845-1862: Salons and Exhibitions reviewed by Charles Baudelaire, translated and edited by Jonathan Mayne (London: Phaidon Press, 1965)

Paul Chenavard
Philosophy of History
ca. 1850
oil on canvas
(design for unexecuted mosaic)
Musée des Beaux-Arts de Lyon

Paul Chenavard
Ménage à Trois
ca. 1840
drawing, with watercolor
private collection

Paul Chenavard
Amorous Reflections
ca. 1840
drawing, with watercolor
private collection

Paul Chenavard
Ugolino and one of his Sons
(study for painting, Dante's Inferno)
ca. 1845-46
drawing
Musée du Louvre

Paul Chenavard
Dante's Inferno
1846
oil on canvas
Musée Fabre, Montpellier

Paul Chenavard
The Divine Tragedy
1869
oil on canvas
(grisaille study for painting)
Musée Municipal, Hyères

Paul Chenavard
The Divine Tragedy
(detail with Apollo and Marsyas)
1869
oil on canvas
Musée du Louvre