Showing posts with label drapery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label drapery. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 22, 2026

Italian Drawings Identified by Philip Pouncey

Giovanni Bellini
Three Heads
before 1516
drawing
British Museum

Attributed to Francesco Bonsignori (ca. 1460-1519) until reattributed by Pouncey and Gere in their 1950 British Museum catalogue of Italian drawings.  Co-author J.A. Gere "observed the strong influence of Mantegna and has suggested that the drawing may have been inspired by a particular sort of Roman tomb relief in which a bust of the deceased appears alongside those of members of his family."

Giovanni Bellini
Head of a Man looking Up
before 1516
drawing
(fragment of cartoon, pricked for transfer)
British Museum

Traditionally attributed to Melozzo da Forlì (1438-94) until reattributed by Pouncey and Gere in their 1950 British Museum catalogue of Italian drawings. 

Jacopo Bertoia
Heads of Six Horses
ca. 1570
drawing
Royal Collection, Windsor

"The old attribution was to Perino del Vaga,  The present attribution was given by Pouncy in 1955.  It has been suggested that there may be some relation to the fighting horses in the background of a painting of the Rape of the Sabines in the Museo Civico, Bologna, anciently attributed to Girolamo Mirola, a close associate of Bertoia whose personality is still somewhat of a mystery."

Giovanni Battista Barbiani
The Holy Trinity welcoming St Benedict and St Scholastica
ca. 1595-1600
drawing
(study for altarpiece)
Musée du Louvre

Philip Pouncey made regular post-war consulting visits to the Louvre.  Late in his career he identified the maker of this previously anonymous drawing as Barbiani by comparing the work with a reproduction of a painted altarpiece housed obscurely in an abbey in Cesena.  That painting was documented as by Giovanni Battista Barbiani, and the drawing was shown to be his study for it.  Pouncey's paper image-files stimulated and nourished his talent for recalling and comparing images mentally, though only a minority of cases involved this sort of direct one-to-one correspondence.    

Giovanni Antonio Boltraffio
Portrait of a Young Man
before 1516
drawing
Musée du Louvre

When this portrait drawing entered the Louvre in 1671 it was held to be by Leonard da Vinci himself.  Over the years it gradually sank to "School of Leonardo" and then "Anonymous Italian 16th century" – Pouncey made the case for a particular one of Leonardo's followers, basing Boltraffio's authorship on details of physiognomy in several of his painted portraits, but also on less tangible psychological qualities.  
 
Francesco Allegrini
Seated Woman
before 1663
drawing
(study for figure of Juno in ceiling fresco)
Scottish National Gallery, Edinburgh

Giovanni Baglione
Slaying of Leo, Emperor of the Armenians
ca. 1610-12
drawing
British Museum

Baglione's preparatory drawing – for a surviving ceiling fresco in S. Maria Maggiore, Rome – was donated to the British Museum in 1993 as a memorial to Philip Pouncey.  The National Art Collections Fund participated in the gift which originated with Julien Stock of Sotheby's in London, an organization that frequently relied on Pouncey's advice.    

Giovanni Baglione
Christ on the Cross
flanked by the Virgin and St John the Evangelist

ca. 1600
drawing
Musée du Louvre

The Louvre catalogue describes Baglione's Crucifixion sketch as unconnected to any known Baglione painting, crediting Pouncey's identification of the artist in this case to specific eccentricities of technique observable in common with those in well-documented drawings.  The artist is characterized as an elusive magpie, appropriating a variety of stylistic elements without transforming or combining them.  This can be observed even in a sample as small as the four Baglione drawings (from four different institutions) lined up here, none of which seems to resemble any of the others.   

Giovanni Baglione
Miracle of St Andrea Corsini
ca. 1629
drawing
Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge

Pouncey saw the Miracle of St Andrea Corsini for sale at Christie's in 1977 – credited only to 'Roman School, 17th century' – and bought it for his personal collection, recognizing the hand as Baglione's. "He later presented it to the Fitzwilliam in commemoration of the exhibition held there in his honour in 1985."   

Giovanni Baglione
Study of Two Young Women
ca. 1609
drawing
Fondation Custodia, Paris

Baglione's drawing of two young women (or of the same woman drawn twice) was attributed to Jacopo da Empoli (1551-1640) when Pouncey examined it in 1955.  He then reassigned it to Baglione, an opinion confirmed by subsequent scholarship.   

Francesco Brizio
St Cecilia
ca. 1604-1605
drawing
Musée du Louvre

Pouncey recognized this Brizio drawing at the Louvre as a bozzetto for one of the ruined frescoes in the cloister of the Bolognese church, San Michele in Bosco.  These were executed by a group of artists working under Ludovico Carracci.  The paintings subsequently fell into such neglect as to become effectively illegible.  Yet the program can be largely reconstructed from preparatory drawings like this one and from prints made at the time.   

Michelangelo Anselmi
Group of Six Angels
ca. 1532-35
drawing
Musée du Louvre

Anselmi's angels in the Louvre were linked by Pouncey in 1952 to a corresponding group of angels in a British Museum drawing – both tied to a group of comparable angels supporting clouds in a documented Anselmi painting.  Pouncey speculated that the artist may have frescoed the present angels as a frieze in a chapel Vasari reported him decorating in Parma.  That work was destroyed in 1812, leaving few known traces.   

Lazzaro Baldi
Death of Virginia
(slain by her centurion-father to avoid dishonor)
ca. 1650-60
drawing
Musée du Louvre

The collector Everhard Jabach sold a vast collection of drawings, now in the Louvre, to Louis XIV in 1671.  Baldi's Death of Virginia had been produced not long before this sale was made, yet it remained in the Louvre's 'anonymous Italians' file for the following three centuries – until Philip Pouncey linked it to a post-mortem inventory listing a series of drawings Baldi had produced for sale on the theme of well-known murders in the antique world, essentially a pretext for costume dramas with classical settings.  

Giovanni Balducci
Raising of Lazarus
ca. 1580
drawing
Musée du Louvre

The Raising of Lazarus was long known to correspond with a chapel fresco in the crypt of Basilica di San Marco in Florence.  That chapel was embellished by a number of Florentine artists around 1580, led by Balducci's master, Giovanni Battista Naldini.  The Louvre drawing was by extension assumed by generations of scholars to belong to Naldini.  Pouncey showed that both drawing and painting exhibit weaknesses in technique that apply to Balducci but not to Naldini or his other collaborators.    

Domenico Beccafumi
Standing Woman
ca. 1517
drawing
Musée du Louvre

Beccafumi's study of a draped woman remained an unidentified Italian work until Pouncey located the painted figure it had been designed for – appearing in Beccafumi's fresco of The Marriage of the Virgin in Siena's Oratory of the Compagnia di San Bernardino.  Of course by itself such a match between a drawing and a painting cannot prove that the one preceded and contributed to the other.  Numberless surviving drawings are copies after rather than studies before.  Scholars over time have developed fairly nuanced methods to distinguish such differences.

Baccio Bandinelli after Michelangelo
Head of a Young Man
ca. 1520-25
drawing
Musée du Louvre

Baldassare Peruzzi created the Head of Young Man according to the 17th-century inventory when this drawing arrived at the Louvre.  Later Peruzzi was dropped and it became Florentine School.  Next, it was assigned to Michelangelo's devoted disciple Daniele da Volterra.  In 1955 Pouncey expressed the opinion that "les traits et la touche sont plus grossiers que chez Daniele," and proposed the less dexterous Bandinelli, a suggestion that has since gained general acceptance.   

Thursday, September 3, 2026

Lord Arundel's Collections

Leonardo da Vinci
Drapery Study for The Last Supper
ca. 1495
drawing
(formerly in the Arundel Collection)
Royal Collection, Windsor

Leonardo da Vinci
Bust of a Child
ca. 1500
drawing
(formerly in the Arundel Collection)
Royal Collection, Windsor

Wenceslaus Hollar after Leonardo da Vinci
Bust of a Child
1645
etching
Philadelphia Museum of Art

Leonardo da Vinci
Caricature of a Man
ca. 1495
drawing
(formerly in the Arundel Collection)
Getty Museum., Los Angeles

Wenceslaus Hollar after Leonardo da Vinci
Two Caricatures
1645
etching
Philadelphia Museum of Art

Hollar made a sequence of these caricatured "couples" by combining figures that appeared individually in Leonardo's original drawings.   

follower of Leonardo da Vinci
Bust of a Man
ca. 1510-20
drawing
(formerly in the Arundel Collection)
Royal Collection, Windsor

Wenceslaus Hollar after Leonardo da Vinci
Bust of a Man
ca. 1644-52
etching
Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York

Leonardo da Vinci
Bust of a Man
ca. 1510
drawing
(formerly in the Arundel Collection)
Royal Collection, Windsor

Wenceslaus Hollar after Leonardo da Vinci
Head of a Man
ca. 1644-52
etching
Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York

follower of Leonardo da Vinci
Head of a Man
ca. 1510
drawing
(formerly in the Arundel Collection)
Royal Collection, Windsor

Wenceslaus Hollar after Leonardo da Vinci
Head of a Man
1645
etching
Herzog Anton Ulrich Museum, Braunschweig

Leonardo da Vinci
Album of Drawings
compiled ca. 1570
former Arundel
Royal Collection, Windsor

By 1630 Lord Arundel's agents in Italy had obtained for him an album (above) containing "hundreds" of original drawings by Leonardo da Vinci, assembled around 1570 by the artist Pompeo Leoni who had obtained them in batches from Leonardo's heirs.  This album was retained by the Howard heirs until after the Restoration.  Lord Arundel's grandson Henry was at length allowed to reclaim his title as 6th Duke of Norfolk in 1677.  As a thanks-offering to King Charles II for the restoration of the title (which his grandfather had also legitimately claimed but had never received), Henry gave the Leonardo drawings to the Royal Collection, where they have remained.       

Leonardo da Vinci
Head of Leda
ca. 1504-1506
drawing
(formerly in the Arundel Collection)
Royal Collection, Windsor

Leonardo da Vinci
Study of Woman's Hands
ca. 1490
drawing
(formerly in the Arundel Collection)
Royal Collection, Windsor

Leonardo da Vinci
Head of St Philip
(study for The Last Supper)
ca. 1495
drawing
(formerly in the Arundel Collection)
Royal Collection, Windsor

follower of Leonardo da Vinci
Head of a Man
ca. 1520
drawing
(formerly in the Arundel Collection)
Royal Collection, Windsor
 

Thursday, August 20, 2026

Adolph Menzel

Adolph Menzel
Man fallen out of Bed
ca. 1843
drawing
Kupferstichkabinett, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin

Adolph Menzel
Man fallen out of Bed
ca. 1843
drawing
Kupferstichkabinett, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin

Adolph Menzel
Unmade Bed
ca. 1846
drawing
Kupferstichkabinett, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin

Adolph Menzel
Cast Collection, Altes Museum, Berlin
1848
watercolor on paper
Kupferstichkabinett, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin

Adolph Menzel
The 1000-year-old Linden Tree at Lorch Abbey
ca. 1860
drawing
Kupferstichkabinett, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin

Adolph Menzel
Portrait Studies of Dr van Zander and Graf zu Dohna-Schlodien
1863
watercolor on paper
Kupferstichkabinett, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin

Adolph Menzel
Moritzhof Garden Restaurant
1864
watercolor and gouache on paper
Kupferstichkabinett, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin

Adolph Menzel
Seated Officer in Historic Garb
ca. 1870
drawing
Kupferstichkabinett, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin

Adolph Menzel
The Barberini Faun (in Munich)
1874
drawing
Kupferstichkabinett, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin

Adolph Menzel
Model in Renaissance Clothing
ca. 1875
drawing
Kupferstichkabinett, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin

Adolph Menzel
Models in Renaissance Clothing
ca. 1875
drawing
Kupferstichkabinett, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin

Adolph Menzel
Judge Walther Enters
(illustration to The Broken Jug by Heinrich von Kleist)
1877
wood-engraving
Kupferstichkabinett, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin

Adolph Menzel
Madonna in the Theatine Church in Munich
ca. 1880
drawing
Kupferstichkabinett, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin

Adolph Menzel
Market Umbrellas in Piazza delle Erbe, Verona
ca. 1881-83
drawing
Kupferstichkabinett, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin

Adolph Menzel
Figure Study for Neptune
1888
drawing
Hamburger Kunsthalle

Adolph Menzel
Entrance Steps, Maria Magdalenen Kirche, Karlsbad
1894
drawing
Kupferstichkabinett, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin

We have seen before that science is always a double-edged weapon to defend or attack any artistic procedure.  It can probe a little into the mysteries of vision; it cannot tell the artist what conclusions to draw from his findings.  And so the observable fact that looking at the elements in our field of vision will result in a picture which will not create an illusion can be adduced to prove that traditional methods are false or, conversely, that they are indispensable. 

We have no right to assume that the upholders of the academic tradition were ignorant of this dilemma.  It is formulated quite explicitly in the charter of academic theory, Idée de la perfection de la peinture by Roland Fréart de Chambray, one of the patrons of Poussin, published in Le Mans in 1662: "Whenever the painter claims that he imitates things as he sees them he is sure to see them wrongly.  He will represent them according to his faulty imagination and produce a bad painting.  Before he takes up his pencil or brush he must therefore adjust his eye to reasoning according to the principles of art which teach how to see things not only as they are in themselves but also how they should be represented.  For it would often be a grave mistake to paint them exactly as the eye sees them, however much this may look like a paradox."  

It is this paradox, I believe, which accounts for the fact that illusionist art grew out of a long tradition and that it collapsed as soon as the value of this tradition was questioned by those who relied on the innocent eye.  . . .  In fact, the achievement of the innocent eye, what modern authorities call "stimulus concentration," turned out to be not only psychologically difficult but logically impossible.  The stimulus, as we know, is of infinite ambiguity, and ambiguity as such, to return to the theme song of this book, cannot be seen – it can only be inferred by trying different readings that fit the same configuration.  I believe, indeed, that the artist's gift is of this order.  He is the man who has learned to look critically, to probe his perceptions by trying alternative interpretations both in play and in earnest.  Long before painting achieved the means of illusion, man was aware of ambiguities in the visual field and had learned to describe them in language.  Similes, metaphors, the stuff of poetry no less than of myth, testify to the powers of the creative mind to create and dissolve new classifications. 

– E.H. Gombrich, Art and Illusion: a Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation (Princeton University Press, 1960)

Saturday, August 15, 2026

Agostino Carracci

Agostino Carracci
Putto leaning on Plinth
before 1602
drawing
Graphische Sammlung Albertina, Vienna

Agostino Carracci
Putto pulling Rope
before 1602
drawing
Graphische Sammlung Albertina, Vienna

Agostino Carracci
Studies for Mascaron Ornaments
ca. 1600
drawing
Graphische Sammlung Albertina, Vienna

Agostino Carracci
Drapery Studies
before 1602
drawing
Graphische Sammlung Albertina, Vienna

Agostino Carracci
St Lucy
ca. 1581
engraving
Graphische Sammlung, ETH Zürich

Agostino Carracci
The Virgin with the Holy Spirit
ca. 1581
engraving
Graphische Sammlung, ETH Zürich

Agostino Carracci
St Jerome
ca. 1595-1602
drawing
Graphische Sammlung Albertina, Vienna

Agostino Carracci after Francesco Vanni
St Jerome
ca. 1595
engraving
Graphische Sammlung, ETH Zürich

Agostino Carracci after Francesco Vanni
St Francis with Musical Angel
1595
engraving
Graphische Sammlung, ETH Zürich

Agostino Carracci
Cain slaying Abel
before 1602
drawing
Graphische Sammlung Albertina, Vienna

Agostino Carracci
Study of Kneeling Men in Cloaks
before 1602
drawing
Graphische Sammlung Albertina, Vienna

Agostino Carracci
Baptism of Christ
ca. 1581
etching and engraving
Graphische Sammlung, ETH Zürich

Agostino Carracci after Paolo Veronese
Virgin and Child enthroned with St Joseph, St John the Baptist,
St Anthony Abbot, and St Catherine

1582
engraving
Graphische Sammlung, ETH Zürich

attributed to Agostino Carracci
Half-Length Figure Study for Ignudo
ca. 1595
drawing
(study for fresco)
National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne

Agostino Carracci
Half-Length Study of Pointing Figure
before 1602
drawing
Graphische Sammlung Albertina, Vienna

Agostino Carracci
Omnia Vincit Amor
(Cupid overcoming Pan with Nymphs watching)
ca. 1599
drawing
(print study)
Städel Museum, Frankfurt

. . . the German critic Konrad Lange wrote a long book on the aesthetics of illusion.  He saw, correctly I believe, that all reading of images demands what Coleridge calls a "willing suspension of disbelief." To him all aesthetic pleasure in art was rooted in our oscillation between two series of associations, those of reality and those of art.  The terminology and the examples of the book sound curiously old-fashioned, and its aesthetic bias is no longer ours.  But his psychological insights enabled Lange to diagnose the tendencies of his time pretty shrewdly: 

"Following the overemphasis of the idea of nature for a time, we now [in 1907] have the stressing of the idea of art.  Elements which impede illusion gain in interest.  A painting must not be natural but must aim at "decorative" effects.  If previously painting strove passionately after the illusion of depth, artists now strive with equal passion to emphasize the plane.  If previously geometric schematization was rejected as inartistic, artists now wallow in canonic proportions, the gold section, the equilateral triangle.  If previously glazes were used to give luminosity to colors and to increase the sense of distance, colors are now spread in a dull mat medium that is seen mainly as pigment.  If previously technical skill was overrated, it is now held in contempt."   

All this was written before the last desperate revolt against illusionism and the peep-show picture, the rise of cubism.  Cubism, I believe, is the most radical attempt to stamp out ambiguity and to enforce one reading of the picture – that of a man-made construction, a colored canvas.  If illusion is due to the interaction of clues and the absence of contradictory evidence, the only way to fight its transforming influence is to make the clues contradict each other and to prevent a coherent image of reality from destroying the pattern in the plane.  

– E.H. Gombrich, Art and Illusion: a Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation (Princeton University Press, 1960)