Friday, March 24, 2023

Recumbent Figures

Théophile Steinlen
Model on Bed
ca. 1895
oil on canvas
Musée d'Orsay, Paris

Félix Vallotton
Cadaver
1894
oil on canvas
Musée de Grenoble

Edgar Degas
After the Bath
ca. 1886
pastel
Musée d'Orsay, Paris

Ford Madox Brown
Haydee discovering the Body of Don Juan
(scene from the mock-epic poem by Byron)
ca. 1869-78
oil on canvas
Musée d'Orsay, Paris

Henry Fuseli
Eriphyle and the Erinyes
1810
wash drawing
Musée du Louvre

William Blake
Pity
("pity like a naked, newborn babe" – Macbeth)
ca. 1795
colour print with hand-coloring
Tate Britain

Nicola Malinconico
The Good Samaritan
ca. 1703-1706
oil on canvas
Palazzo Pretorio, Prato

Antonio Molinari
The Good Samaritan
before 1704
drawing
Musée du Louvre

Hans von Aachen
The Good Samaritan
ca. 1570-80
drawing
Musée du Louvre

Simon Vouet
Académie
before 1649
drawing
Musée du Louvre

Luca Saltarello
Dead Christ
before 1645
oil on canvas
private collection

Cornelis Bloemaert
Ixion
ca. 1655-90
engraving
Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam

Giovanni Mannozzi (Giovanni da San Giovanni)
Study of Sleeping Woman
ca. 1620
drawing
Musée du Louvre

Cavaliere d'Arpino (Giuseppe Cesari)
Figure of a Dead Man
ca. 1595-96
drawing
(study for fresco, Palazzo dei Conservatori, Rome)
Musée du Louvre

Cristóvão de Figueiredo
Martyrdom of St Hippolytus
ca. 1520-30
oil on panel
Museu Nacional de Arte Antiga, Lisbon

Ancient Rome
Funerary Monument of Flavius Agricola
2nd century AD
marble
(discovered in 1623 when erecting Bernini's Vatican Baldacchino)
Indianapolis Museum of Art

"Many years ago, whilst dissecting a lion, in my early youth, I was amazingly impressed with its similarity as well as its difference in muscular and bone construction to the human figure.  It was evident the lion was but a modification of the human being, varied in organic construction and muscular arrangement, only where it was necessary he should be, that his bodily powers might suit his instincts, his propensities, his appetites, and his lower degree of reasoning power.  On comparing the two, I found the human being stood erectly on two feet, the lion horizontally on four.  On placing the lion on his two hind feet, resting on the heel and toes like the human being, I found he could not remain so; I found he had no power of grasping with his fore-paws (answering to the human hand, and but a modification); I found he could not move his fore-paw arms right from the shoulder, nor his hind-feet limbs right from the hip; I found his feet flat, his body long, his brain diminished, his eyes above the centre of his head, his jaw immense, and vast muscle occupying that portion of the skull, to assist the action of the jaw, which is filled by brain in a human creature; I found his spine long, his pan-bone narrow, his inner ancle lower than the outer, his chest contracted, and his fore-arm as long as his upper-arm.  I put down these distinctions as points characteristic in head and figure of a brutal and unintellectual being."

"I then examined the man: I found his power of grasping with his hand, by the action of his thumb, perfect; I found the motion of his arm free from the shoulder-joint, and his thigh free from the hip; I found his feet arched, his inner ancle the highest, his pan-bone large, which, by resistance to the action of the great extensor of the legs, increases their power, his eyes at the centre of his skull, his upper-arm longer than the fore-arm, his spine short, and his brain enormous. I put down these distinctions as characteristic in face and figure of a superior and intellectual being."

"These differences were facts – they were intentional, or accidental! – they were formed by the Creator, or they were not! – if they were as they were, there was reason in the differences, and that reason issued from the Creator's mind.  Surely, then, it was justifiable to lay down a principle of form from ascertaining these distinctions."    

– Benjamin Robert Haydon, from Anatomy as the Basis of Drawing (1835)