Tuesday, August 18, 2026

Ferdinand Hodler

Ferdinand Hodler
Self Portrait
1879-80
oil on canvas
Musées d'Art et d'Histoire, Genève

Ferdinand Hodler
The Drinkers
1886
oil on canvas
Musées d'Art et d'Histoire, Genève

Ferdinand Hodler
Self Portrait
1886
drawing, with added gouache
Musées d'Art et d'Histoire, Genève

Ferdinand Hodler
The Dispute
1894
oil on canvas
Musées d'Art et d'Histoire, Genève

Ferdinand Hodler
Spring
1901
mixed media on canvas
Museum Folkwang, Essen

Ferdinand Hodler
Forest Stream near Leissigen
1904
oil on canvas
Kunsthaus Zürich

Ferdinand Hodler
Landscape at Lake Geneva
ca. 1906
oil on canvas
Neue Pinakothek, Munich

Ferdinand Hodler
Student at Jena in 1813 
ca. 1908
oil on canvas
(study for fresco)
Neue Pinakothek, Munich

Ferdinand Hodler
Lake Thun with Symmetrical Reflections
1909
oil on canvas
Musées d'Art et d'Histoire, Genève

Ferdinand Hodler
Woman in a Transport
1911
oil on canvas
Musées d'Art et d'Histoire, Genève

Ferdinand Hodler
Unanimity
1911-12
oil on canvas
Musées d'Art et d'Histoire, Genève

Ferdinand Hodler
Portrait of Mathias Morhardt
1913
oil on canvas
Musées d'Art et d'Histoire, Genève

Ferdinand Hodler
Portrait of Félix Vibert
1915
oil on canvas
Musées d'Art et d'Histoire, Genève

Ferdinand Hodler
Valentine Godé-Darel on her Deathbed
1915
gouache and oil paint on paper
Musées d'Art et d'Histoire, Genève

Ferdinand Hodler
Self Portrait
ca, 1916
oil on paper
Musées d'Art et d'Histoire, Genève

Ferdinand Hodler
Self Portrait
ca. 1917-18
drawing
Musées d'Art et d'Histoire, Genève

Cézanne's much-quoted advice to Bernard to look at nature in terms of simple shapes of known property, that is, in terms of cylinders, cones, and spheres, aims at exactly the same type of reclassification.  It surely has nothing to do with cubism but rather with the type of art teaching in French schools which was current at the time Cézanne was young and which he wished to pass on to his young admirer.  Art teaching, then, like that of most painters' manuals, still proceeds on the basis of what may be called a "common sense version" of traditional Western philosophy.  The world consists of substances which have sensory qualities of varying permanence.  Beech leaves "are" small, lozenge-shaped, and bright green, distant mountains "look" blue.  The artist's business is simply to analyse appearances down into these qualities and to match those he can in his medium.  There is no essential difference, in this view, between the artist who paints a landscape and another who copies a picture.  Both are concerned with piecemeal matching, much as a mosaicist would be who works from a cartoon and selects one stone after another that comes as close as possible to the corresponding hue of his prototype, arranging them in the shapes he sees in front of him. 

Now the facsimile, like the photograph, has mainly served the aestheticians as a foil to stress the creative element necessary to art.  One may admit that the creation of indistinguishable duplicates is of greater interest to the forgers of banknotes than to artists, but we have seen, I hope, that psychologically the making of any likeness is far from being a trivial achievement.  

– E.H. Gombrich, Art and Illusion: a Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation (Princeton University Press, 1960)