Sunday, July 26, 2026

Eaux

Jacques-Laurent Agasse
La Fontaine Personnifiée
1837
oil on canvas
Musées d'Art et d'Histoire, Genève

Emile Burdet
Pyramids of Cheops and Khafre reflected in Flood Water
ca. 1885
albumen print
Cabinet d'Arts Graphiques des Musées d'Art et d'Histoire, Genève

Jeroen Krabbe
Suriname River at Danpaati II
2006
oil on canvas
Museum de Fundatie, Zwolle, Netherlands

Agricol-Louis Montagné
Fountain at Nîmes
ca. 1910
oil on canvas
Musée des Beaux-Arts de Nîmes

Gaetano Gandolfi
Design for Fountain
ca. 1785-95
drawing
Graphische Sammlung Albertina, Vienna

Jørgen Roed
Fountain in Gardens of Villa Borghese, Rome
ca. 1839
oil on canvas
Nivaagaard Museum, Denmark

Hubert Robert
Wall Fountain
1767
drawing
Musée du Louvre

Susanne Maria von Sandrart after Jean Le Pautre
Fountain Design with Salmacis and Hermaphroditus
1678
etching
Herzog Anton Ulrich Museum, Braunschweig

Franz Sigrist the Elder
Fountain with Nymphs
ca. 1760
etching
Museum für Angewandte Kunst, Vienna

Abraham van Diepenbeeck
The Deluge
ca. 1636-39
drawing
(print study for illustration to Ovid)
Städel Museum, Frankfurt

Julius Schnorr von Carolsfeld
The Deluge
1826
drawing
(print study for Bible illustration)
Kupferstichkabinett, Staatliche Kunstsammlungen, Dresden

Friedrich Reclam
Staircase with Cascade in a Park
ca. 1760
drawing
Graphische Sammlung Albertina, Vienna

Thomas Ender
Ladder Falls near Heiligenblut
1845
watercolor on paper
Graphische Sammlung Albertina, Vienna

Franz Kobell 
Landscape with Waterfall and Temple Ruins
before 1822
drawing
Kupferstichkabinett, Staatliche Kunstsammlungen, Dresden

Adrian Zingg
River Keppbach near Dresden
ca. 1780-90
drawing
Kupferstichkabinett,
Staatliche Kunstsammlungen,Dresden

Lucas van Valckenborch
Mountain Landscape with Waterfall
1595
oil on panel
Liechtenstein Museum, Vienna

And yet Leonardo, if anyone, knew that the artist's desire to create, to bring forth a second reality, finds its inexorable limits in the restrictions of his medium.  I feel we catch an echo of the disillusionment with having created only a picture that we found in Lucien [sic] Freud when we read in Leonardo's notes: "Painters often fall into despair . . . when they see that their paintings lack the roundness and the liveliness which we find in objects seen in the mirror . . . but it is impossible for a painting to look as rounded as a mirror image . . . except if you look at both with only one eye."

Perhaps the passage betrays the ultimate reason for Leonardo's deep dissatisfaction with his art, his reluctance to reach the fatal moment of completion: all the artist's knowledge and imagination are of no avail, it is only a picture that he has been painting, and it will look flat.  Small wonder that contemporaries describe him in his later years as most impatient of the brush and engrossed in mathematics.  Mathematics was to help him to be the true maker.  Today we read of Leonardo's project to build a "flying machine," but if we look into Leonardo's notes we will not find such an expression.  What he wants to make is a bird that will fly, and once more there is an exultant tone in the master's famous prophecy that the bird would fly.  It did not.  And shortly afterward we find Leonardo lodging in the Vatican – at the same time when Michelangelo and Raphael were there creating their most renowned works – quarreling with a German mirror maker and fixing wings and a beard to a tame lizard in order to fighten his visitors.  He made a dragon, but it was only a whimsical footnote to a Promethean life.  The claim to be a creator, a maker of things, passed from the painter to the engineer – leaving to the artist only the small consolation of being a maker of dreams. 

– E.H. Gombrich, Art and Illusion: a Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation (Princeton University Press, 1960).