Sunday, August 16, 2026

Lucas Cranach (Elder and Younger)

Lucas Cranach the Elder
Man of Sorrows with the Virgin and St John the Evangelist
ca. 1540
oil on panel
Hamburger Kunsthalle

Lucas Cranach the Elder
Christ at the Column as Man of Sorrows
1515
oil on panel
Gemäldegalerie Alte Meister, Dresden

Lucas Cranach the Elder
Eve
ca. 1528-30
oil on panel
Royal Museum of Fine Arts, Antwerp

Lucas Cranach the Elder
Fall of Man
ca. 1510
woodcut
Herzog Anton Ulrich Museum, Braunschweig

Lucas Cranach the Elder
Crucifixion
ca. 1501
woodcut
(unique impression)
Kupferstichkabinett, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin

Lucas Cranach the Elder
Crucifixion with the Converted Centurion
1536
oil on panel
National Gallery of Art, Washington DC

Lucas Cranach the Elder
Risen Christ
1537-38
oil on panel
Bildgalerie von Sanssouci, Potsdam

Lucas Cranach the Elder
St Eustace
ca. 1515-20
oil on panel
(altarpiece fragment)
Liechtenstein Museum, Vienna

Lucas Cranach the Elder
Martyrdom of the Seven Sons of St Felicitas
ca. 1530-35
oil on panel
(outer wings of altarpiece)
Landesmuseum Hannover

Lucas Cranach the Younger
Catherine, Princess of Brunswick-Grubenhagen
ca. 1540-41
tempera on paper
Musée des Beaux-Arts de Reims

Lucas Cranach the Younger
Portrait of a Prince of Saxony
ca. 1540
tempera on paper
Musée des Beaux-Arts de Reims

Lucas Cranach the Younger
Portrait of a Prince
ca. 1540
tempera on paper
Musée des Beaux-Arts de Reims

Lucas Cranach the Younger
Portrait of a Woman
ca. 1565
oil on panel
Alte Pinakothek, Munich

Lucas Cranach the Elder
Albrecht von Brandenburg-Ansbach
ca. 1511-12
drawing
Graphische Sammlung Albertina, Vienna

Lucas Cranach the Elder
Portrait of a Man
1522
oil on panel
National Gallery of Art, Washington DC

Lucas Cranach the Elder
Joachim I, Prince of Anhalt-Dessau
1532
oil on panel
Anhaltische Gemäldegalerie, Dessau

The function of representation in cubist paintings is not to inform us about guitars and apples, nor to stimulate our tactile sensations.  It is to narrow down the range of possible interpretations till we are forced to accept the flat pattern with all its tensions.  Even nonobjective art derives some of its meaning from the habits and mental sets we acquired in learning to read representations.  Indeed, we have seen that any three-dimensional shape on the canvas would be illegible or, which is the same, infinitely ambiguous, without some assumptions of probabilities that we must bring to it and test against it.  The painter who wants to wean us from these assumptions has perhaps only one way open to him.  He must try to prevent us from interpreting his marks on the canvas as representations of any kind by compelling us to switch over to that alternative which we have observed in the interpretation of drawings; he must make us read his brushmarks as traces of his gestures and actions.  This, I take it, is what the "action painter" aims at.  He wants to achieve an identification of the beholder with his Platonic frenzy of creation, or rather with his creation of a Platonic frenzy.  It is quite consistent that these painters must counteract all semblance of familiar objects or even of patterns in space.  But few of them appear to realize that they can drive into the desired identification only those who know how to apply the various traditional consistency tests and thereby discover the absence of any meaning except the highly ambiguous meaning of traces.  If this game has a function in our society, it may be that it helps us to "humanize" the intricate and ugly shapes with which industrial civilization surrounds us.  

– E.H. Gombrich, Art and Illusion: a Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation (Princeton University Press, 1960)