Tuesday, August 4, 2026

Visual Preferences (20th Century: 1949)

Francis Bacon
Study from the Human Body
1949
oil on canvas
National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne

Nadia Benois
Piazza Navona, Rome
1949
oil on canvas
Government Art Collection, London

Håkon Bleken
Self Portrait
1949
oil on canvas
Trondheim Kunstmuseum, Norway

Byron Browne
Apocalyptic Image
1949
oil on canvas
Lowe Art Museum, University of Miami

Joseph Cornell
Cygne Crépusculaire
1949
wood, glass, printed paper, mirror
Art Institute of Chicago

Richard Diebenkorn
Untitled
1949
oil on canvas
North Carolina Museum of Art, Raleigh

Clarence van Duzer
Apartment #10 Looking West
1949
encaustic on canvas
Akron Art Museum, Ohio

Philippe Halsman
Collette Marchand
1949
gelatin silver print
Lowe Art Museum, University of Miami

Carl Robert Holty
Bathers
1949
oil on canvas
McNay Art Museum, San Antonio, Texas

Edward Hopper
High Noon
1949
oil on canvas
Dayton Art Institute, Ohio

Alex Katz
Lakewood
1949
oil on panel
Farnsworth Art Museum, Rockland, Maine

Fernand Léger
Study for The Country Outing
1949
drawing
Menil Collection, Houston

George Platt Lynes
Oskar Kokoschka
1949
gelatin silver print
Art Institute of Chicago

Sidney Nolan
Untitled (Landscape)
1949
oil on panel
Portland Museum of Art, Maine

Gordon Parks
Ingrid Bergman - Stromboli
1949
gelatin silver print
Dallas Museum of Art

Harry Sefarbi
Interior: Jim
1949
oil on canvas
Barnes Foundation, Philadelphia

from Dichtung und Wahrheit (An Unwritten Poem)

                                                              XVIII
It is easy for a poet to hymn the benevolent deeds of Aphrodite (filling his song with charming pictures like the courtship ritual of the Great Crested Grebe or the curious behavior of the male stickleback, and then all those jolly nymphs and shepherds loving away like mad while empires rise and fall) provided that he thinks of her as directing the lives of creatures (even human beings) in general. But what is her role when it is a matter of love between two people with proper names who speak in the first and second person? When I say I love You, I admit, naturally, that I owe to Aphrodite the general possibility of loving, but that I should love You is, I claim, my decision (or Your command) not hers. Or so, at least, I shall claim when I am happily in love: should I find myself unhappily in love (reason, conscience, my friends warn me that my love threatens my health, pocket and spiritual salvation, nevertheless I remain attached), then I may very well hold Aphrodite responsible and regard myself as her helpless victim. So, when a poet wishes to speak of the role of Aphrodite in a personal relation, he usually sees her as a malevolent Goddess: it is not of happy marriage that she tells, but of tragic and mutually destructive affairs.

                                                                   XIX
The unhappy lover who commits suicide does not kill himself for love but in spite of it – to prove to Aphrodite that he is still a freeman, capable of a human deed, not her slave, reduced to mere behavior.

                                                                    XX
Without personal love the act of kind cannot be a deed, but it can be a social event. A poet, commissioned to write an epithalamium, must know the names and social status of the bride and bridegroom before he can decide upon the style of diction and imagery appropriate to the occasion. (Is it for a royal or a rustic wedding?) But he will never ask: – "Are the bride and the bridegroom in love?": for that is irrelevant to a social event. Rumors may reach him that the Prince and Princess cannot bear each other but must marry for dynastic reasons, or that the union of Jack and Jill is really the mating of two herds of cattle, but such gossip will have no influence upon what he writes. That is why it is possible for an epithalamium to be commissioned.                                                             

– W.H. Auden (1959)