Wednesday, August 5, 2026

Visual Preferences (20th Century: 1950)

Max Beckmann
The Pompeii Clowns
1950
oil on canvas
Seattle Art Museum

Sonia Delaunay
Composition
1950
screenprint
Lowe Art Museum, University of Miami

Robert Doisneau
Madame Colette
1950
gelatin silver print
Portland Museum of Art, Maine

Max Ernst
Inspired Hill
1950
oil on canvas
Menil Collection, Houston

Robert Frank
London
1950
gelatin silver print
Institut Valencià d'Art Modern

Petr Golub
Great Stalin - Best Friend of the Latvian People!
1950
lithograph (poster)
Nasher Museum of Art, Durham, North Carolina

Fernand Léger
Deauville, August
1950
lithograph
Art Institute of Chicago

Felix H. Man
Fernand Léger, Montparnasse
1950
gelatin silver print
Moderna Museet, Stockholm

Rollie McKenna
Central Park, New York
1950
gelatin silver print
Loeb Art Center, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, New York

Hans Namuth
Jackson Pollock in the Studio of James Brooks
1950
gelatin silver print
Dallas Museum of Art

Irving Penn
Coal Man, London
1950
gelatin silver print
Art Institute of Chicago

Irving Penn
Kerchief Glove (Dior), Paris
1950
gelatin silver print
Art Institute of Chicago

Pablo Picasso
Vase
1950
glazed terracotta
Kunstmuseum, The Hague

Kurt Seligmann
Clio
1950
oil on canvas
Art Institute of Chicago

Charles Sheeler
Family Group
1950
oil on canvas
Orlando Museum of Art, Florida

Charles Sheeler
Skyline
1950
oil on canvas
Wichita Art Museum, Kansas

from Dichtung und Wahrheit (An Unwritten Poem)

                                                              XXI
The poets tell us of heroic deeds done for love: – the lover goes to the ends of the earth to fetch the Water of Life, he slays ogres and dragons, he scales a glass mountain, etc., and his final reward is the hand and heart of the girl he loves (who is usually a Princess). But all this is in the social realm, not the personal. It is quite in order that the girl's parents (or public opinion) should say: – "Such-and-such a quality is essential in a son-in-law (or a King)," and insist that every suitor submit to whatever test, be it scaling a glass mountain or translating a passage of Thucydides unseen, will show whether he possesses it or not: and any suitor who passes the test successfully has the right to demand their consent to the match. But no test is conceivable which would make the girl herself say: "I could not love any suitor who fails it, but I shall love the suitor, whoever he may be, who passes it"; nor is any deed conceivable which would give a suitor the right to demand her love.
     Suppose, too, that she doubts the quality of his affection (is he only after her body or her money?), then no deed of his, however heroic, can reassure her: in relation to her personally, all it can prove is that his motive, noble or base, is strong enough to make him submit to the Test. 

                                                              XXII 
To give another a present is a deed of generosity, and the epic poet spends almost as much time describing the gifts his heroes exchange and the feasts they give as he spends describing their deeds in battle, for the epic hero is expected to be as generous as he is brave. The degree of generosity is verified by the market value of the gift: the poet has only to tell us the size of the rubies and emeralds set in the scabbard, or the number of sheep and oxen consumed at the feast. But how is a poet to speak convincingly of gifts made for love ("I will give you the Keys of Heaven," etc.)? The market value of a personal gift is irrelevant. The lover tries to choose what, from his knowledge of his beloved's tastes, he believes she would like most to receive at the moment (and receive from him): this might be a Cadillac, but it might equally well be a comic postcard. If he is a would-be seducer, hoping to buy, or she a would-be prostitute, hoping to sell, then, of course, the market value is very relevant. (Not invariably: his intended victim might be a very rich girl whose sole interest in life was collecting comic postcards.)

                                                              XXIII 
The anonymous gift is a deed of charity, but we are speaking of eros, not of agape. It is as much of the essence of erotic love that it should desire to disclose itself to one other, as it is of the essence of charity that it should desire to conceal itself from all. Under certain circumstances, a lover may try to conceal his love (he is a hunchback, the girl is his own sister, etc.) but it is not as a lover that he tries to conceal it; and if he were then to send her gifts anonymously, would not this betray a hope, conscious or unconscious, of arousing her curiosity to the point where she would take steps to discover his identity?

– W.H. Auden (1959)