Tuesday, August 11, 2026

Visual Preferences (20th Century: 1956)

Eileen Agar
Seated Figure
1956
oil on canvas
Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, Rotterdam

Josef Albers
Homage to the Square: Alto Pluto
1956
oil on panel
Wichita Art Museum, Kansas

Diane Arbus
Woman on the Street with her Eyes Closed
1956
gelatin silver print
Art Institute of Chicago

Francis Bacon
Figure in Mountain Landscape
1956
oil on canvas
Kunsthaus Zürich

Isabel Bishop
Lunch Break
1956
etching
Wichita Art Museum, Kansas

Wendell Brazeau
Study for Still Life with Calendar
1956
colored pencils on paper
Seattle Art Museum

Frederick Brill
Quarry Face, Worth Matravers, Dorset
1956
oil on canvas
Tate Britain

Reginald Brill
Rest
1956
oil on canvas
Tate Britain

Gray Foy
Bulbs
1956
drawing
Menil Collection, Houston

Ivon Hitchens
Wood Landscape no. 2
1956
oil on canvas
Fralin Museum of Art, Charlottesville, Virginia

Edward Hopper
Sunlight on Brownstones
1956
oil on canvas
Wichita Art Museum, Kansas

Rockwell Kent
Resurrection Bay
1956
oil on canvas
Portland Museum of Art, Maine

Frank Paulin
Belmont Races
1956
gelatin silver print
Loeb Art Center, Vassar College,
Poughkeepsie, New York

Frank Paulin
Untitled (Man with Traffic Light)
1956
gelatin silver print
North Carolina Museum of Art, Raleigh

Pablo Picasso
Femme nue devant le jardin
1956
oil on canvas
Stedelijk Museum, Amsterdam

Josef Sudek
Egg and Carafe
1956
gelatin silver print
Moderna Museet, Stockholm

from Dichtung und Wahrheit (An Unwritten Poem)
                                                          
                                                            XLII
Of the many (far too many) love poems written in the first person which I have read, the most convincing were, either the fa-la-la's of a good-natured sensuality which made no pretence at serious love, or howls of grief because the beloved had died and was no longer capable of love, or roars of disapproval because she loved another or nobody but herself; the least convincing were those in which the poet claimed to be in earnest, yet had no complaint to make. 

                                                            XLIII
A soldier in battle who knows his Homer well may take the deeds of Hector and Achilles (which are possibly fictitious) as a model and thereby be inspired to fight bravely himself. But a would-be lover who knows his Petrarch well cannot thereby be inspired to love: if he takes the sentiments expressed by Petrarch (who was a certain real person) as a model and attempts to imitate them, then he ceases to be a lover and becomes an actor playing the role of poet Petrarch. 

                                                            XLIV
Many poets have attempted to describe the experience of Romantic Love as distinct from vulgar desire. (Suddenly abashed, I should like to say, aware of having irreverently blundered like a chattering monkey or an unwashed stableboy into a Sovereign Presence, tongue-tied, trembling, afraid to stay yet loath to go, for here, if anywhere, it is good to be . . .) But has one not had similar experiences (of a numinous encounter) in non-human contexts? (I remember coming unexpectedly upon a derelict iron foundry in the Harz Mountains.) What makes the difference in the human context? Vulgar desire? 

                                                             XLV
I should like to believe that it is some evidence of love when I can truthfully say: – Desire, even in its wildest tantrums, can neither persuade me it is love nor stop me wishing it were.

– W.H. Auden (1959)