Sunday, June 28, 2026

Inward

Anthony van Dyck
Head Study
ca. 1618-19
oil on paper
Clark Art Institute, Williamstown, Massachusetts


Jan Cossiers
Study of Young Woman
before 1671
drawing
British Museum

Corneille van Clève
La Loire et le Loiret (detail)
1707
marble
Musée du Louvre

Dante Gabriel Rossetti
Elizabeth Siddal
1855
drawing
Ashmolean Museum, Oxford

Camille Pissarro
Jeanne Rachel Pissarro (Minette)
ca. 1862
watercolor on paper
Ashmolean Museum, Oxford

Julia Margaret Cameron
May Prinsep (Coleridge's Christabel)
1865
albumen silver print from glass negative
Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York

Mosé Bianchi
Seclusion
1890
oil on canvas
Villa Reale, Milan

Marie Spartali Stillman
Cloister Lilies
1891
watercolor and gouache on paper
Ashmolean Museum, Oxford

Clarence H. White
Clarence H. White and Jean Reynolds
ca. 1906
cyanotype
Princeton University Art Museum

Alfred Stieglitz
Portrait of a Woman
1907
autochrome
National Gallery of Art, Washington DC

Raphael Soyer
Waiting for the Audition
ca. 1950
oil on canvas
National Gallery of Art, Washington DC

Richard Pousette-Dart
Mark Rothko
ca. 1950
gelatin silver print
Museum of Modern Art, New York

Francis Bacon
Study for a Portrait IV
(after Life Mask of William Blake)

1956
oil on canvas
Museum of Modern Art, New York

Richard Diebenkorn
Woman in a Window
1957
oil on canvas
Buffalo AKG Art Museum, New York

Michelangelo Pistoletto
Features of People
1962
oil on paper, mounted on steel
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

Marion Brenner
Galia
1998
gelatin silver print
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

William T. Wiley
Slightly Ahead of the Seasons
2001
lithograph
Smithsonian American Art Museum, Washington DC

Every art is based upon a selection, and the art of Racine selected the things of the spirit for the material of its work.  The things of sense – physical objects and details, and all the necessary but insignificant facts that go to make up the machinery of existence – these must be kept out of the picture at all hazards.  . . .   But, as a rule, Racine's characters speak out most clearly when they are most moved, so that their words, at the height of passion, have an intensity of directness unknown in actual life.  . . .  Very different is the Shakespearean method.  There, as passion rises, expression becomes more and more poetical and vague.  Image flows into image, thought into thought, until at last the state of mind is revealed, inform and molten, driving darkly through a vast storm of words.  Such revelations, no doubt, come closer to reality than the poignant epigrams of Racine.  In life, men's minds are not sharpened, they are diffused, by emotion; and the utterance which best represents them is fluctuating and agglomerated rather than compact and defined.  But Racine's aim was less to reflect the actual current of the human spirit than to seize upon its inmost being and to give expression to that. 

– Lytton Strachey on Racine (1908)